Daily reminder that DynamicQ is still shit

Shadòw·Jul 15, 2016·8 votes·430 views

title

18 Comments

Azure HamsterJul 15, 20163 votes

Daily reminder / downvote stating Dynamic Queue is just fine.

Caitlyn

ShadòwJul 15, 20163 votes

it isn't and you know it.

Azure HamsterJul 15, 20163 votes

{quoted}

it isn't and you know it.

No, I'll repeat for the record, without sarcasm, that I love Dynamic Queue. One of the best things to go in the game in a while. Along with the new pings.

Caitlyn

ShadòwJul 15, 20162 votes

that's your opinion, but you can't just say that it is fine because there are so many points indicating that it is not.

Azure HamsterJul 15, 20162 votes

{quoted}

that's your opinion, but you can't just say that it is fine because there are so many points indicating that it is not.

And that is your opinion. The points I have seen claimed to indicate DQ is busted are just incorrect. There are no "facts" that indicate DQ is busted.

Caitlyn

ShadòwJul 15, 20161 votes

ofc there are.

One of them being that the DynQ rank isn't showing any specific skill

SoloQ showed your skill as solo player with teammates you've never played before with

Teamranked shows your skill as a full team.

DynamicQ is just a mixture of all different premade sizes combined in 1 Rank. This is and will never be a fair system.

Azure HamsterJul 18, 20162 votes

{quoted}

ofc there are.

One of them being that the DynQ rank isn't showing any specific skill

SoloQ showed your skill as solo player with teammates you've never played before with

Teamranked shows your skill as a full team.

DynamicQ is just a mixture of all different premade sizes combined in 1 Rank. This is and will never be a fair system.

I disagree with your conclusion. SoloQ had Duos. Things have not really changed. Only if SoloQ was previously truly solo could your argument make sense.

Caitlyn

ShadòwJul 18, 20161 votes

Duo doesn't really affect much. Apart from that there was only 1 Duo per team max, the rest was pure solo.

But in DynQ there are often 3men premades mixed with a Duo against a 4 men pre and a Solo Player or absurd things like that.

Amasa DelanoJul 18, 20162 votes

The new pings are amazing.

Azure HamsterJul 18, 20161 votes

[{quoted}](name=Amasa Delano,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=zpt7gjEp,comment-id=0000000000000001,timestamp=2016-07-18T19:38:06.607+0000)

The new pings are amazing.

Fuck yeah they rule.

Caitlyn

XeruonJul 15, 20163 votes

Daily Reminder that echoing the same thing over and over again isn't going to change anything.

Oh wait this is just upvote fishing, isn't it?

Azure HamsterJul 15, 20161 votes

{quoted}

Daily Reminder that echoing the same thing over and over again isn't going to change anything.

Oh wait this is just upvote fishing, isn't it?

I'll bite, have an upvote. :) Upvotes should be worth IP (just kidding)

Caitlyn

XeruonJul 15, 20162 votes

Hey at least I didn't get raged at for being a "filthy DynQ supporter"

I don't like dynQ that much either, but everything has already been said. Plus rebooting the ranked ladder is pointless right now.

I swear this is the American civil war all over again.

4th Chiming LambJul 15, 20163 votes

Non-Daily Reminder that Daily Reminders are not Daily, and that most people have stopped the DynaQ Hate.

Dominick DestineJul 15, 20161 votes

Hating a bad thing is not a bad thing.

redfeenixJul 15, 20162 votes

I like DQ :(

BIue MonkJul 18, 20161 votes

Lol @ people liking DQ, it's just fine to like a broken system, but just don't say it's not broken, it has been proven.

ZephyrDrakeJul 18, 20161 votes

[{quoted}](name=BIue Monk,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=zpt7gjEp,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2016-07-18T15:52:51.228+0000)

Lol @ people liking DQ, it's just fine to like a broken system, but just don't say it's not broken, it has been proven.

proven by who? people who don't like the system? give me this so call "proof" that actually shows that it's "broken" and not a bunch of babies whining because they don't have something they never had to begin with