Nautilus vs Blitzcrank

Nautilus because he isn't 100% completely dependent on one single ability.

Naut by far. Every first auto roots his target and deals decent bonus damage, his E can do good damage when stacked and it slows, a massive shield that helps him survive like a Leona, and one of the best ults in the game. Point and click and knocks everybody up in it's path. There's a reason he's called the king of cc and despite being tank, he deals decent damage.

While his Hook isnt as strong as Blitz's, it is safer to use in worse case scenarios where you hooked someone you didnt want like a Rammus. With Naut, at least his hooks wont pull a Rammus directly into your team.

Blitz is better when your team is snowballing but almost useless when its the other way around. Naut is just better across the board.

in ever way possible.. his Q is more useful , he has a shield on W that grants him bonus damage, he E aoe slow, his ult is aoe knock up, his passive is a auto stun ... by far more tanky and more forgiving. way more usefull even if behind.. better tank by all means ,

Blitz is better, if you can land the hooks. It's certain death.

Blitzcrank. Higher playrate and higher winrate. Clearly he's a more sucessful champion at winning games than Nautilus.

/thread

Nautilus of course. Blitz is useless if he has no Q, and if you can predict it then he can't even do anything. Naut just has way more in his kit, and unlike Blitzcrank he can peel decently.

so why is Blitzcrank have a higher win rate at pro play AND has a higher rating on most websites that rank champion tiers?

I'm just wondering because intuitively it seems that Naut is better from my point of view as well. He has more CC, he doesn't NEED to land his hook (he has a point and click AOE R) and his hook is more reliable (longer ranger, faster speed, easier to aim). Blitz has 1 ability that isn't very useful if he didn't land his hook (his W) while all of Nautilus' abilities can be used in combat assuming he's front-lining.