Does it even matter how far you put Brand behind?

Herbie RL··34 votes·2,476 views

Honestly feels like he can go 0-5-0 in lane as a "support" but still shred everyone in team fights.

80 Comments

Ixoziel31 votes

I wish they had just buffed his ap ratios instead of doubling his passive damage. So much of his power is in that thing that all he needs is a Liandry's and he does huge damage.

Iffy Jarl1 votes

i mean he got 2 percent extra dmg, ap ratios would make him melt squishes

Saianna3 votes

AP doesn't grow on trees, you know... Brand would have to buy AP items, thus making him worse "support"

With what Riot did he gets free damage out of ass because Riot hired bunch of circus chimps in balance team for half the price.

Mylon Requiem9 votes

If AP grew on trees, I'm pretty sure Brand would just burn them down....

Saianna1 votes

I think Maokai would bitchslap him for doing that :P

50000000000000001 votes

Nah, AP Maokai just uses his children.

Melledoneus1 votes

When you want to get something off a tree, just BURN IT DOWN, FOOL!

Iffy Jarl1 votes

{quoted}

AP doesn't grow on trees, you know... Brand would have to buy AP items, thus making him worse "support"

With what Riot did he gets free damage out of ass because Riot hired bunch of circus chimps in balance team for half the price.

tf are u even talking about [sg-lux-2]

Saianna1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Iffy Jarl,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=xHgjKtsf,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2018-04-01T06:41:54.012+0000)

i mean he got 2 percent extra dmg, ap ratios would make him melt squishes

You said yourself that (better/buffed) ap ratios would let him kill squishes better. But those are just AP ratios. You still need AP for ratios to work. As a support-brand your options for AP are limited. Unless you are playing support-brand as noobs play nidalee/lux as supports (FYI: they play them like mages in botlane).

That being said: If Riot did smart and buffed his AP RATIOS while nerfing his BASE damage, they'd in turn PUSH HIM AWAY from botlane, because he would NEED AP to function at all and to do so he'd NEED GOLD and he'd definitely NOT get the GOLD with an ADC in the same lane.

Thus is my "Ap doesn't grow on trees". You don't get AP out of ass while being a support. You need to buy it. And supports are gold-starved 24/7 as fuck.

Now, you get what the fuck I was even talking about ;)?

Iffy Jarl1 votes

{quoted}

You said yourself that (better/buffed) ap ratios would let him kill squishes better. But those are just AP ratios. You still need AP for ratios to work. As a support-brand your options for AP are limited. Unless you are playing support-brand as noobs play nidalee/lux as supports (FYI: they play them like mages in botlane).

That being said: If Riot did smart and buffed his AP RATIOS while nerfing his BASE damage, they'd in turn PUSH HIM AWAY from botlane, because he would NEED AP to function at all and to do so he'd NEED GOLD and he'd definitely NOT get the GOLD with an ADC in the same lane.

Thus is my "Ap doesn't grow on trees". You don't get AP out of ass while being a support. You need to buy it. And supports are gold-starved 24/7 as fuck.

Now, you get what the fuck I was even talking about ;)?

"ap ratios would let him kill squishes better. But those are just AP ratios. You still need AP for ratios to work." -

You're not even making points here you are just stating facts

"If Riot did smart and buffed his AP RATIOS while nerfing his BASE damage, they'd in turn PUSH HIM AWAY from botlane" -

ok, this is a point that no one is contesting and one you should have started with by saying something along the lines of "Rather then adding damage to his passive they should have reduced it and added better ratios" because the nerfing of the passive wasn't already on the table you are presenting the buff to ap ratios without mentioning that this would be accompanied by nerfs to his passive. You also wanted me to deduce all this from "Ap doesn't grow on trees"

Saianna1 votes

You're not even making points here you are just stating facts

I'm stating obvious fact that you somehow managed to miss, surprisingly.

You also wanted me to deduce all this from "Ap doesn't grow on trees"

Not just from that, but also from half of your own sentence:

ap ratios would make him melt squishes

Combine the 2 and deduction is as simple as 1+1=2

It's funny how your ego compells you to keeping this conversation when you got owned hard as fuck. But whatever mate ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Iffy Jarl1 votes

{quoted}

I'm stating obvious fact that you somehow managed to miss, surprisingly.

Not just from that, but also from half of your own sentence:

Combine the 2 and deduction is as simple as 1+1=2

It's funny how your ego compells you to keeping this conversation when you got owned hard as fuck. But whatever mate ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

owned hard as fuck? you did nothing lol my point still stands, all you did was make a separate point lol

Saianna1 votes

So that's not the fault of inflated ego, but crippled intelligence (and maybe some inflated ego afterall?), I see. Anyways, cool talking with ya, brah. Lemme just take a step back and not participate in this cool discussion ;)

Laters!

Ixoziel2 votes

[{quoted}](name=Iffy Jarl,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=xHgjKtsf,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2018-04-01T06:41:54.012+0000)

i mean he got 2 percent extra dmg, ap ratios would make him melt squishes

He didn't get "2% extra damage" he got 2% extra max hp per stack damage. That's a huge difference.

AP ratios don't have to make him melt squishies. They could have buffed the AP ratio on his passive by a lot instead of buffing the base %. They could have even added scaling to the dot portion. That would have made him stronger with items.

50000000000000001 votes

It also stacks 3 times, which means the passive burn went from 2%-6% to 4%-12% scaling with levels. That's substantial.

Iffy Jarl1 votes

{quoted}

He didn't get "2% extra damage" he got 2% extra max hp per stack damage. That's a huge difference.

AP ratios don't have to make him melt squishies. They could have buffed the AP ratio on his passive by a lot instead of buffing the base %. They could have even added scaling to the dot portion. That would have made him stronger with items.

Please elaborate the difference between "2 percent extra damage" and "2% extra max hp per stack damage" also buffing the ratios at which damage scales with ap does more damage to squishies than buffing the percentage health damage

Bârd8 votes

Yeah, so?

Even with little gold, he provides good enough base damage and utility that you have to respect him.

That's true for almost every support.

You always have to respect Thresh hook. Always remember that TK can save his ADC. Even a 0/8/2 Bard can pick you off with his ult.

In the same way, you can't just say "Don't worry about Brand, I beat him in lane! Lets all clump together in teamfights!"

If you put him that far behind, he'll be extremely squishy and won't be able to 100-0 somebody in one rotation. If you play the fight correctly, you'll be able to steamroll him. That said, you can't just ignore him.

ExternalLink2 votes

{quoted}

Yeah, so?

Even with little gold, he provides good enough base damage and utility that you have to respect him.

That's true for almost every support.

You always have to respect Thresh hook. Always remember that TK can save his ADC. Even a 0/8/2 Bard can pick you off with his ult.

In the same way, you can't just say "Don't worry about Brand, I beat him in lane! Lets all clump together in teamfights!"

If you put him that far behind, he'll be extremely squishy and won't be able to 100-0 somebody in one rotation. If you play the fight correctly, you'll be able to steamroll him. That said, you can't just ignore him.

Difference between a feeding support who can still make a good play, and a feeding support who can straight up blow you up singlehandedly.

AirKingNeo2 votes

he can't unless you literally tank his entire spell rotation.

ExternalLink1 votes

{quoted}

he can't unless you literally tank his entire spell rotation.

Soooo, he can? lol.

Bârd1 votes

If you tank all three of his basic abilities, allow his ultimate to bounce to you the maximum number of times, and stand in two passive procs, he'll kill you... maybe.

If that actually happens to you on a regular basis... congratulations you played yourself.

ExternalLink1 votes

{quoted}

If you tank all three of his basic abilities, allow his ultimate to bounce to you the maximum number of times, and stand in two passive procs, he'll kill you... maybe.

If that actually happens to you on a regular basis... congratulations you played yourself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpCQd_YaTT4

Rrrrighttt...

Bârd1 votes

Yeah, we're talking about FEEDING Brands.

THIS FUCKER IS FULL BUILD

ExternalLink1 votes

{quoted}

Yeah, we're talking about FEEDING Brands.

THIS FUCKER IS FULL BUILD

And two levels down.

Bârd1 votes

Levels are completely irrelevant here.

If he was level 18, the only difference is that his E would be dealing 40 more damage and he might have a couple more points of AP from runes.

The increased base AD/AS stats are irrelevant since he doesn't need to auto at this stage. The increased base defenses are irrelevant since he's not taking damage here.

The disscussion is based on Brands who are piss poor. We're talking Brands who lost lane hard and only have item 3098 item 3020 item 3136 when the enemy carries are sitting on three full items.

A support Brand who has gotten to full build is no longer a support Brand. He's a core Brand with a sightstone.

ExternalLink1 votes

{quoted}

Levels are completely irrelevant here.

If he was level 18, the only difference is that his E would be dealing 40 more damage and he might have a couple more points of AP from runes.

The increased base AD/AS stats are irrelevant since he doesn't need to auto at this stage. The increased base defenses are irrelevant since he's not taking damage here.

The disscussion is based on Brands who are piss poor. We're talking Brands who lost lane hard and only have item 3098 item 3020 item 3136 when the enemy carries are sitting on three full items.

A support Brand who has gotten to full build is no longer a support Brand. He's a core Brand with a sightstone.

Good point. The real challenge would be providing video footage that a behind brand can't burst a squishy.

KlydeFrog4 votes

lol because people are idiots and dont get adaptive helm isnt my issue

Herbie RL18 votes

{quoted}

lol because people are idiots and dont get adaptive helm isnt my issue

You say that like every champion can buy adaptive helm.

50000000000000004 votes

Practically everyone can get some sort of defensive item against Brand. The issue isn't so much that there aren't options, but like Eedat said, a support who's behind shouldn't do too much damage.

Neptunia xoxo1 votes

{quoted}

Practically everyone can get some sort of defensive item against Brand. The issue isn't so much that there aren't options, but like Eedat said, a support who's behind shouldn't do too much damage.

Zyra Lux Vel'Koz and even Bard can do damage even when behind lol it's nothing new. If Brand actually is behind then his main abilities Q W E R don't do much damage but it will be more of his passive and Liandry Rylai doing the trick but in my opinion even when vsing him and hes feeding it's not that hes going to 100-0 even if he lands his abilities it's more hes just going to chunk me due to the dots. I see people commenting on the forums saying they should lower his core abilities damage which is retarded tbh if anything nerf liandry dot and his passive then up AP scaling. BUT the problem with doing this is his mid lane status gets nerfed putting him further behind then he already is in mid so something else needs to happen aswell.

50000000000000001 votes

Well yes, it's his passive that does most of the damage, at least for Brand support. Pretty much every argument I've seen is lower base and increase scaling, or revert passive dot to 2%.

Neptunia xoxo1 votes

{quoted}

Well yes, it's his passive that does most of the damage, at least for Brand support. Pretty much every argument I've seen is lower base and increase scaling, or revert passive dot to 2%.

lol his base damage has nothing to do with it. Brand just works really well with Liandry Rylai. His base damage is nowhere near the problem and actually his base damage gets outshined by alot of other mages. I think his scaling damage should be increased and item like Liandry should get nerfed and reduce his % burn by 1% atleast. But in all honesty Brand is not some top tier god champion he has a lot of problems due to range and being immobile so that's why you almost never see him in pro play or masters/challenger since it's also really easy to counter pick him. I think Brand can be annoying to play against but very easy to play against also because if you pick something like Leona Alistar Nami ect you have a 10x easier lane than he does.

Eedat33 votes

Because having to counter build the 0/5 support is logical

Feel Apathy3 votes

{quoted}

Because having to counter build the 0/5 support is logical

If you're 5 kills ahead, maybe you should think a little ahead and buy a null magic mantle so by the time he finishes his magic pen items, you're not hit for true damage.

It doesn't matter if he's 0-5 if all he builds is 30 Mpen and you have 36 MR, his base damage will still knock you out.

And that goes for pretty much any mage.

Eedat3 votes

Did you even read? He's saying build an entire adaptive helm

Feel Apathy2 votes

{quoted}

Did you even read? He's saying build an entire adaptive helm

Did you even read my comment at all? I said to build your stats early before you get blown up.

Velzard of Koz1 votes

But that's not what Eedat was responding to like... At all...

GinormousVner1 votes

And that goes for pretty much any mage.

Name another mage who is as threatening as a Brand with a 0/5/0 KDA.

Go on, i'll wait.

Feel Apathy1 votes

{quoted}

Name another mage who is as threatening as a Brand with a 0/5/0 KDA.

Go on, i'll wait.

Velkoz Katarina

Thefrostyviking2 votes

Goor sir....are you mayhaps misunderstanding the effect of adaptive helm?

It reduces damage taken from the same ability or effect within a few seconds after it has hit.....meaning it really only works against spam clicks and DOT type spells.

A great deal of Brands damage is....well not either, particularly if he quickly detonates his passive, then there is almost no effect from adaptive at all aside from the magic resistance.

KlydeFrog1 votes

it makes his passive useless same as teemo azizr, the list goes on

Thefrostyviking1 votes

Are we playing the same game? This is Brand´s passive :

Brand's spells light his targets ablaze, dealing 4% of their maximum Health in magic damage over 4 seconds, stacking up to 3 times. When Blaze reaches max stacks on a Champion or monster, it becomes unstable. After 2 seconds it detonates, dealing magic damage equal to 12% - 16% (based on level) (+1% per 60 ability power) of their maximum Health to all targets in an area.

Kindling: Brand gains 6 / 8 / 10 / 12 / 14 / 16 / 18 mana (at levels 1 / 3 / 6 / 9 / 12 / 15 / 18) when he kills a unit afflicted by Blaze.

I dont see adaptive helmet doing much of anything against that explosion which is the main damage ._.

If he as 400 AP at max rank of it then it deals 24% of your max HP instantly before magic resist......add liandry and a voidstaff on that, or a rabadon.

KlydeFrog1 votes

Seeing I get it against him and it procs hmmmmm

Thefrostyviking1 votes

Consider this, say that a melee with 4000 health and some magic resist eats a full rotation from brand who has 400 AP and voidstaff, the passive would thus deal 24% of the melee's health before magic resist, so 960 health.

Adaptive would reduce the proc by 20%, down to 768.

Its a reduction in damage taken from brands passive by 192......which is something but.....is it really enough?

Brand still deals damage with his abilities and liandry, and off those only Liandry will see any damage reduction from the adaptive.

So lets say that Brand manages to keep the melee on fire for 5 seconds, since he always get liandry+rylai thats 5 seconds of losing 2% max health per second.

So 80 health per second up to 400, reduced by 20% down to 320.

So, in total adaptive helmet would roughly reduce the total damage by 272.......from the damn passive effects of Brand´s rotation, none of the direct damage was even counted so far, he would still deal 1088 damage with those passive effects alone to his 4000 health victim.

And with 40% CDR he can do it again four seconds later.

KlydeFrog1 votes

I'll put it this way adaptive helm is one of the most gold efficient items in the game . Cdr Mr health and % damage reduction

Thefrostyviking1 votes

That i won't deny, the base stats on it are definitely good, and the passive is at least alright against Brand´s unexplored passive or stuff like Cassio/malz/anivia.

What i meant to point out was that, Adaptive helmet doesnt really pose any significant boon against Brand, as he doesnt have enough dots or spamcasting to make it's passive truly effective.

.....Well that and his damage is pretty damn nuts, basically a metric ton of damage extra for free when landing a full rotation later on, on every single target that he manages to trigger his passive on.

Meanwhile Lissandra gets to cast 1 spell for free every minute.....

Madsin252 votes

If I build an adaptive helm on anyone that isn't a tank I am going to-

  1. Do absolutely no damage.

2.Die to the ADC in 4 autos.

But the good news is I won't die to brand yay!

Thefrostyviking1 votes

I have bad news for you.....if you as a melee were to have 4000 health and a adaptive helmet then brand with liandry+void+rylai and roughly 500 AP would still deal 1088 damage over 5 seconds......with his passive and liandry alone.

Adaptive would prevent 272 damage all in all.

And with 40% cdr he can do it again 4 seconds after he finished casting the last spell from the first rotation.

Madsin251 votes

Bro did I really need the /s

Thefrostyviking1 votes

You made it abundantly clear that you felt it was useless for you would do no damage and die of marksmen anyway....but i just wanted to make sure you knew it wasnt even good against Brand anyway since that was uncertain^^

More from Gameplay

More by Herbie RL