level three should work. i know many people dislike that idea but this has to stop. i just had a galio and a taliyah in my game who both played the champions for the first time. taliyah destroyed two teamfights for us by splitting our team in the jungle. galio fed 14 kills and tried to 1v1 the enemy carries nonstop and kept losing. if people dont stop being stupid we have to start protecting them from their foolishness.
it is not hard to play a few normal games with a champion and trying to understand it before picking it in ranked. why is it so difficult to be reasonable and people destroy other peoples games with this?
I 100% agree with this idea. Mastery 3 seems like a fair spot to be. You can earn mastery 3 from any game mode to, its really just shows "hey ive played this champion like 10 times i understand the basics of my champion atleast"
How about NO?
Smite does this and honestly its not a bad idea...
... I would have put it at lvl 4 or 5 or ideally 6.. But I can live with lvl 3.
and this is coming from someone who rarely plays more than 3 champions in ranked people...
if i had my way... i would put it at lvl 6 mastery required.. that way by getting at least TWO S- you have at least proved have have actaulyl done WELL with the champion twice
an alternate way would make them have to get an least S- in the champ before they were allows to play it in ranked. that would be more forgiving than lvl 6
