Why Does Sated Devourer Still Exist?

63536895_DEL··3 votes·699 views

I don't know why the boards stopped complaing about it. Its still broken, still impossible to balance, still causing one sided games, still goes against riots own design philosophy, AND STILL CAUSING HALF OF THE BALANCE PROBLEMS IN THE GAME

List of Junglers that would be much closer to balanced if Sated Devourer was removed from the game MasterYi Nocturne Shyvana Tryndamere Udyr Warwick XinZhaoJax and a few others could also be added to this list I'm not saying these champions are balance, but if it wasn't for devouer they would be manageable.

I don't want Sated Devouer to be nerfed or replaced by another attack speed jungle item, I want it to be removed. Riot failed with Feral Flair, and they failed with Devourer. In my opinion they are both massive failures that caused severe balance problems for the game. At this point I don't think its possible for Riot to make a balance attack speed jungle item. I think the junglers who use devouer should just have to use warrior or cinderhulk both of which are perfectly balance at the moment.

12 Comments

FurretHasAGlock3 votes

Looks at match history Oh look a game he just lost looks at game Oh look, a yi! Oh he has sated. He is salty af Looks at more Oh look a game he lost. see's udyr with sated That's interesting.

63536895_DEL2 votes

Nice Ad Hominem attack there. Those are just 2 recent games I lost, if you keep looking farther down my history you can see games I won that had a Devourer Jungler on the enemy team. I put in my post that Devourer makes game one sided, I made this post because Devourer is broken and causes games to be lost based on a single champion building a specific item. So yes I am salty because sometimes I lose games not because of good decisions or skill from the enemy players, but because their jungler built one item and carried them.

FurretHasAGlock1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Red Death LoL,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=saX3u0mv,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2016-01-28T21:27:29.679+0000)

Nice Ad Hominem attack there. Those are just 2 recent games I lost, if you keep looking farther down my history you can see games I won that had a Devourer Jungler on the enemy team. I put in my post that Devourer makes game one sided, I made this post because Devourer is broken and causes games to be lost based on a single champion building a specific item. So yes I am salty because sometimes I lose games not because of good decisions or skill from the enemy players, but because their jungler built one item and carried them.

I honestly find devourer balanced as long as you can shut them down. Its a late game item, win early, and its gg. Devourer=snowball item

Dreadlocks2 votes

Playing 4v5 for the first 20 mins or so sounds pretty balanced to me.

69469238DEL11 votes

This must be a joke, actually sating devourer while ganking in a timely fashion is no joke, git gud

63536895_DEL1 votes

They don't gank, they just farm for 10 minutes straight after building Devourer to get sated, and become unstoppable. "git gud" my winrate has been over 60% since season 6 started.

AlwaysByMySide1 votes

Because sated devourer is baller as fuck of course.

BluePolarizer1 votes

Pretty sure that the #1 balance problem with the game is the insane costs of AP items and lack of mana regen and the #2 balance problem with the game is the gutting of Warrior to make it an a purely assassin item instead of a general AD item.

ModWulf Helhammer1 votes

Yeah, not really sure why your having mana regen problems. Maybe don't spam spells so much?

63536895_DEL1 votes

Mana Regen was buffed on a lot of champion during the preseason and all the jungling items recently got there mana regen buffed. I don't what you're talking about as far as warrior is concerned, it gives 60 AD and 10% CDR, idk how that makes it a pure assassin item.

Mat7itan1 votes

I have no problem against any of these champs except Xin, and it's not even because of devourer.... Fuck Xin.

More from Gameplay

More by 63536895_DEL