Is there any reason to pick a warrior jungler over a devourer jungler?

I hate devourer, gives junglers an excuse to farm instead of showing lane presence. The mid and adc both will outdamage the jungler in the majority of games and it would be nice if the jungler would ensure they are not being camped, and help them win lane etc

{quoted}

title

Warrior Junglers dominate Devourer Junglers in the early game + have more presence/devastating ganks. They also find it harder to fall off due to being counter jungled, unlike Devourer junglers who cry everytime they lose a camp/literally commit Sudoku when they are shut out of their own jungle.

Yeah a warrior jungler who has high impact early like a good lee sin or vi will have the game wrapped up before the devourer jungler can get sated(I'm usually the sad shyvana trying to get sated as my lanes lose) disclaimer i am really bad at jungle but i do see this a lot.

Burst assassins like khazix, shaco, rengar.

yeah, maybe the warrior jungler is good vs the devourer jungler. :) You can use the champions kit and early damage to contest skuds in river etc.

much better gankers early on and can get the game go out of controll before sated junglers become relevant same for cinder junglers

Warrior got a 5 ad buff. It's like it is a whole new item.

A lot of games (at least my games) seem to end in a surrender at 20 for one side. Warrior junglers tend to be much stronger for the first 18-20 minutes before the devourer jungler becomes sated. Early ganks can snowball games, and jarvan/lee sin/rek sai/vi can snowball games much more effectively early than yi/shyvana/kayle. Lategame devourer is much more slot efficient, but warrior junglers can still be more useful with their greater tankiness and cc.