We Should Have More Than 3 Bans. But We Should Also Have This...

ThunderSqueak··2 votes·567 views

Everyone knows that Riot needs to give us more than 3 bans per game (I like 5, but that's my opinion). But I think a good way to counter-balance that would be to give each team a "No Ban" pick. Each team would pick a champion that cannot be banned by either side. It would balance out having 5ish bans and it would allow you to: A.) Pick a character that is strong and would work well with a team comp of yours (if you are on a ranked team) B.) Would give you insight on what style your enemy is going for and ways to counter pick

I personally thought this would be cool, but what are your opinions? Love Y'all.

2 Comments

Sett up 4my gank2 votes

A no ban pick would be pretty dumb. people would just choose the strongest champ at that time if they were first pick side. For example skarner this patch.

Searingspear1 votes

The strongest pick during a patch isn't usually as gross as Skarner though. This patch isn't well balanced, and that's pretty commonly known. In most other patches if someone were to make it that obvious that they wanted a champ, the other guys could just counter pick it. I also think it could be pretty funny to bait counter picks, and then counter them.

More from Gameplay

More by ThunderSqueak