+2 LP for playing Support or "Fill"
Would this convince you to play the role more often? It would pad losses with +2, and boost gains with +2.
Would this convince you to play the role more often? It would pad losses with +2, and boost gains with +2.
When you're a support main.
Teheheheheh
So? It still brings incentive for other people to Support, hopefully removing the need for autofill.
Low Key Support is the best role, while every other role has 1/5 of the impact in the game we have have 2/5.
I'd say at least +3 since that's what u lose to dodge :)
You mean IP right? Otherwise support mains will get boosted and adcs will truly hate their supports.
You need 100 LP to get into promos. He is talking about giving +2 LP per game. Over the course of 5 games, thats a grand total of 10 LP. Its the difference between a Gold 2 with 90 LP and Gold 2 with 100 LP. Then when said support player gets into their promos, they still need to win 2/3 or 3/5 to advance. If they cant advance like everyone else, then they dont rank up.
Do you realize how lucky you have to be to actually make use of this? First, think of the small amount of situations this would actually be useful:
At most its a difference of one game's worth of LP, and that requires 6 wins in a row at 14 LP. At the least, its around half a game worth of LP. At the most, its the impact of one game. If you think not having to play one game will get you "boosted" into a rank you dont belong, well, thats an issue on your end of thinking. While there is a skill difference between Gold 2 and Gold 1, nobody will call that boosted. Thats just random fluctuations in skill among the ranks.
How about +2 for autofill, but only if you stay in the role you got autofilled to.
While a decent thought, it is actually unfavorable to existing support mains. When it's better to queue up other roles and hope you get autofilled into your main role, something is flawed.
do you meeeaaan IP? i really hope you mean IP. IP i absolutely agree with, 100% hands down good suggestion, nice one, love it, rito plz
LP....
[zombie-brand-facepalm]
Nah, this wouldn't be fair to people who play other roles. Why should someone get more lp just for playing support or fill
These types of arguments infuriate me.
"here's a solution to a game wide problem"
"yeah but where's my stuff? I don't want anyone else gettin' stuff unless I also get stuff. And it better be just as good as their stuff, frankly better, because top lane carries, but if it's worse, no effin way"
"Ok well then just go back to complaining about auto fill"
I'm a support main. I don't want them just tossing free stuff for playing support. More support players doesn't completely fix the problem if they are only doing it out of greed for LP. I think it would help, but it needs to not be by itself. As part of a suite of things aimed at increasing the number of players playing the role, it would be okay though, and definately not just a straight LP bonus.
"Playing support or fill grants +2 LP at the end of a ranked game, win or lose. Because we believe this will greatly increase the number of players playing support, we are also disabling autofill."
There you go. Happy?
It would maybe be abused by peaple that takes support for faster queue and proceed to steal otherplayer role.
plot twist! Now everyone queues for support and gets auto-filled. Pick order becomes king again. ;p
I think this would encourage more Brand "supports"
Implying Brand isn't support?
He isn't much of one if he's going full damage and has no sightstone.
I've never seen a buffalo, therefore they don't exist.
Just because one guy autofilled and decided to go full AP bot lane doesn't mean everyone does it.
Of course it doesn't. That's not the point. The point is that giving more LP for just queuing up for support doesn't actually encourage people to play supports, it just encourages them to queue up for the support role.
If Brand isn't support then Nautilus isn't either. Both have 0 supportive abilities
You're right, Nautilus isn't a support. He's a top laner. At least that's what he's designed for.
Except Naut has a shit ton of CC which he can use for peel and engage while being tanky and not needing a lot of gold to do this.
As much as i would love to play bard i just can't in solo queue.
Too many times both my top and mid laners let me down.
[zombie-nunu-bummed]
No. I already get a benefit from playing support/fill......FASTER QUEUE TIMES. And I literally base my decision of whether to queue as top/mid or support/fill on how long I am willing to wait. Playing as support/fill doesnt mean you are a better player, and thats what your LP is representing...your skill at the game....
I am a victim of MMR too high for my own skill (I don't understand why this shit happened). I can imagine support mains that get lucky and win a good ammount of games climbing when they shouldn't climb and then having them matched with people way better than them and getting stomped. At 5 wins, it is an extra 10 so you can get at least 18 LP in 5 games and get into a series.
LP and MMR are related, but not the same thing.
The support/fill who was getting +2 LP would actually be playing against lower-tier opponents, because their MMR would be lower than their rank.
[{quoted}](name=Nameless Voice,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=jFHz1RHG,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2016-12-30T18:01:22.844+0000)
LP and MMR are related, but not the same thing.
The support/fill who was getting +2 LP would actually be playing against lower-tier opponents, because their MMR would be lower than their rank.
I know it is, but in the grand scheme +2 takes a long time to rack up. Also, if your LP rank is too much higher than your MMR you start to get LP gains decreased. That means if you've normally been getting +18 but suddenly Rito thinks you are too high LP for your MMR you start gaining +16.
It would balance it out in the end, but could draw people into playing it so that they feel like support and auto fill aren't such punished roles.
Yes, I think at the end of the day the +2 LP would probably be an illusion, since having a higher rank would mean you get less LP for your wins and it balances out.
Still, if it encourages more people to want to play support...
[{quoted}](name=Nameless Voice,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=jFHz1RHG,comment-id=0001000000000000,timestamp=2016-12-30T18:12:53.817+0000)
Yes, I think at the end of the day the +2 LP would probably be an illusion, since having a higher rank would mean you get less LP for your wins and it balances out.
Still, if it encourages more people to want to play support...
I think it would. The only thing that it would do that league maybe wouldn't want it to do, is to help actually good supports or fillers to climb faster.
Instead of writing lower tier you should write "Lower rank, same skill". Just more clarity, you originally confused me there.
Sellouts don't solve problems. They just create more problems.
Best way to deal with auto fill is to remove it or make more champions enjoyable as Support
Take other games like MMORPGs,
In the Lague you have to give gold item to get gold which no one realize how stupid this is Dawngate used to have mechanic that when nearby enemy minion die you get 6 gold if you didn't kill it Heroes of the storm does not rely on Gold to get ahead. Your entire team levels up equally through which you get more talents to enhance your abilities
Good Support Example is Tassadar from Heroes of the Storm
Exactly this. Tassadar, Reghar, Tyrande... all really enjoyable supports
No. good on paper but most likely terrible in practice. This will artificially boost the LP gains of support players, regardless of their skill. Definitely not the thing that you want in a game about skill.
Or... Riot could reward extra IP like reasonable, non-money-grubbing devs. Many players would be thrilled, considering the ridiculous IP gating on this game, and it wouldn't negatively affect the ranking system.
no, but sup is my 2nd choice anyways
+100 IP when filling.
Would get rid of any shortages at low elo shortages, I'm sure there's enough players grinding for IP.
inb4 3 people in bot lane because: I CALLED SUPPORT
inb4 3 people in bot lane because: I CALLED SUPPORT
Only works if you queued for it XD
I would absolutely love to see this. However, I can foresee an abuse case where scrubs would declare Support and try to steal Mid the second they got in the lobby, so there would have to be a solution for this too.
I would absolutely love to see this. However, I can foresee an abuse case where scrubs would declare Support and try to steal Mid the second they got in the lobby, so there would have to be a solution for this too.
They already track what lane you go to... it wouldn't be that hard to code it you have to go to where you are supposed to.
they do track in blind mode but not in draft mode for some reason. Im pretty sure that exact same code in blind mode can be reused tho
As a support main, I would take whatever benefit Riot would give. I do think supports are in an interesting spot where some supports, like Janna, are insanely strong - IF you're in higher ELO. Low ELO non-carry supports just don't cut it since you'll have no impact on the game if the other lanes you can't impact as much don't do well, even if you do make mid roams. For games where your loss is out of your control, I can't help but be biased in feeling great about curbing the LP loss.
all i learned in this thread is that i get way more lp than the average player. Never less than 20 and i main support, it'd probably make me play more ranked honestly.
Rng
Good idea, let's make climbing with support even easier