What about the 2% you get from the "vampirism" mastery. Seems pretty pointless without items backing it up considering that 2% is nonexistent in game and idk why anyone would take spell vamp runes or at least any good player would.
peaches7712 votesYeah it's very little but when i'm low in laning phase it helps a lot surprisingly. I don't have to back every minute.
LaughingStapler2 votesShould it be removed though? I don't know if that would really improve the game. I suppose they could make Vampirism work on all damage dealt instead of separating it by LS and SV but it wouldn't make much of a difference and it's already a good mastery for ADCs and junglers. They could do the same for SV runes and remove LS runes too. It would probably have to be something smaller like 1.25% healing on all damage dealt (reduced for AoE) though.
I've actually been worried about the future of SV runes myself since Riot seems to change this game on a whim in drastic ways for both items and champions. I don't want to invest time in new strategies with SV runes only to find them removed in another few patches. It feels like every time I'm comfortable with a champion/strategy, it gets turned on its head screwing over all my hard work and theorycrafting. RIP AP Kog (my favorite champion was turned into a W bot and deleted with the rework).
Revali1 votesSome weird cases it's ok at best
Ekko's passive fully applies it so it gives you a little below average sustain.
Bobloser35551 votesI think Spellvamp runes are good, I use them on Swain and Cass
