Anyone else skeptical on GA changes

dolphinosplash24··1 votes·1,245 views

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Nt9u9-d5Al0/WOa9wPMZvgI/AAAAAAAAh0s/hrEMQR-xO1Qz6pQtvU5xuR_zoi-fJPa0QCLcB/s320/guardian.png

heres the text that went with it "Guardian Angel is now positioned as an AD/Armor item, with the intention of making its unique effect less attractive to tanks and its build path more attractive to its intended users. Although its build path looks pleasant, we aim to ship it such that it is not very efficient from a gold efficiency and slot efficiency perspective, so that it's not a default third-ish purchase for AD champions. "

I personally think GA tanks that dont do any damage were pretty healthy. But now the GA gives damage. IDK i guess i should play 7.8 before complaining about it but it looks fishy.

3 Comments

Risk of Fate1 votes

Renekton Riven Darius Garen

Most likely the ones that will rush it as a first, if not second item. While 300 seconds is kind of a long time, seems like the benefits it provides outweigh the price.

Karn Bishop1 votes

I don't like this change, adding any ad to it at all guarantees that it will be a second or third item buy for most ADC as it gives them dmg, armor to get better trades, and a revival and i predict that it will be to the point where if your adc does not build it but theirs does early you just straight up lose all control over dragon.

dolphinosplash241 votes

Yes.Rengar ofKhazix courseDarius adcsMasterYi thatsPantheon whoTryndamere imLeeSin worriedJayce aboutJax

More from Gameplay

More by dolphinosplash24