If two people vote not to surrender, the vote should close.
It's not complicated. If the outcome of the vote is decided, why leave the vote open?
It's not complicated. If the outcome of the vote is decided, why leave the vote open?
The only possible reason I could see for it staying open is to see just how much the whole team leans on the matter. If someone were to start a vote and the first two responses were votes against surrendering, you don't know if you're team's on the braking point (it would have been 3-2), or if your team is confident (it would have been 1-4).
That being said, that possible peace of mind that could be brought on some circumstances isn't quite as useful as unveiling the parts of the map/UI that the vote box would be covering up.
if one person doesnt vote and the outcome is 3:1, it should be a surrender, and abstention shouldn't automatically count as a no, since a 3:1 is an absolutely clear majority
And if one guy has been spamming surrender votes since 20 minutes hit and getting 4 "no"s that person should not be able to start another surrender vote after the 2nd time that happens, if the team wants to surrender someone else needs to start it.
Probably irrelevant but...
NEVER SURRENDER!
It is kinda bullshit that 2/1,1/0, 3/1 votes don't work out...
3 say yes 2 say no . the game is waiting for you to get more angry . I think 3 should win it is the majority
Two words: Duo Q's
Because the other 3 votes still can sway others for the next surrender vote.
So you can see everyone's opinion ?
The vote shouldn't show everyone else's decision until everyone has voted.