Fire Dragon needs a complimentary opposite

GigglesO··1 votes·259 views

So I understand the design intent of only having a damage increase dragon, but that leaves out one important aspect of having 4 types of dragons.

What dragon is supposed to be good on tanks?

Well, before you say ocean dragon, ocean dragon is nice and all, but it does much more for your mana and poke fighting than it does for tanks. Lets take some look at the math here. with 3 ocean dragons that is 12% missing/5 and that seems really great on the surface... but lets take a look at how long it would take to heal

12%/5 = 2.4%/second (WOW!) That means you could heal to full from 2% hp in 40 seconds Wow, that isn't bad... Oh wait, it is pretty bad, and to top it off that s without the diminishing returns that is right, it heals you less the more hp you get from it. That means that you would have to stay at 2% hp to get your total hp bar worth of combat hp back... But wait! THERE IS MORE. You also have to be out of combat for 5 seconds, before you can even get this healing buff.


So I guess my biggest question, is why can we have a dragon that benefits carries, but we can't have a useful dragon that benefits tanks?

2 Comments

Chaos Milk Tea2 votes

I'd rather just not have the inernal drake. The other effects are much more interesting for gameplay than simply: You do more damage.

GigglesO1 votes

{quoted}

I'd rather just not have the inernal drake. The other effects are much more interesting for gameplay than simply: You do more damage.

I'd be fine with this too, since damage amp doesn't really add much of anything...

More from Gameplay

More by GigglesO