Can we talk about Jarvan and Garen ? Why Demacians best champs are forgotten ?

StormBladeMaster··3 votes·2,552 views

Hello, first of all i'm not english but i will do my best. I'm posting here because there is more people so it's will have more impact.

I'm asking questions about these 2 champs that i like but i feel they are forgotten by riot.

Jarvan : JarvanIV

I play him the most of these two. He looks cool, the kit is easy and chill to learn. I don't like jungling so i'm playing either top, either supp.

I don't want to talk about Hard MU in top lane for Jarvan, because it's not the subject. I think you must understand that laning as Jarvan vs top champs is not that easy (except the fact that you are safe, you can't really do a thing) but it's not the problem to me.

Can we talk about the W ? What is the concept of having a shield when it's not even shielding properly ? Ok, it's slow but serious guys, do you use a shield to slow ? I don't understand this shield, it's so weak. Even in jungle, it's don't help. I have played him sometimes in jungle and it's even worse than top lane to me. Especially because of mana cost on his spells (without a blue, i think you are fcked).

As top laner, i always start with item 2033, i have no choice, otherwise i'm oom. The Q is the only way to farm safe in hards MU.

Mana is really a problem on Jarvan, it's so much a problem and i don't understand because Jarvan isnt a mage. Garen don't use mana actually so why Jarvan use mana ? Btw, his cooldowns are pretty long so i don't think it's would bother to remove the mana from him.

I'm using Tank runes, i do :

Grasp of the udying (the only tank rune who is useful on Jarvan i think), the problem with Aftershock is if i miss the E Q combo, i'm really in ****. But in a other way, i feel like i would do better if i'm taking Aftershock.

Demolish vs Shield bash (sometimes i do Shield Bash but i prefer Demolish)

Conditioning, because of bonus armor and rm but some people take bone plating and i think it's would be more suitable.

Overgrowth, because the shield is useless, so add 5% to Jarvan shield is not really powerful.

And then, i'm picking Sorcery :

Manaflow band : Because it's my only way to have mana and to not get oom in lane.

Gathering storm : Because i don't know what to do, i'm picking sorcery for manaflow band. Otherwise i would pick Precision.

And yet, i'm still very weak. Even with tanks item. I know Jarvan is not a tank but what he is first ?

Is he an assassin ? Because people usually build him full AD and lethality : I have saw Jarvans building this : item 3071 item 3142 item 3814 item 3147 item 3026 item 3111.

This build is good, with Domination runes, it's lit but it's not suit Jarvan. I mean, Jarvan wear a big golden armor, why would you make him weak and only focusing him on dmg ? I know this build is OP, because you are oneshooting people with R with this build.

But it's not suitable for the character. I mean Jarvan is not an assassin, he is a warrior, a leader warrior maybe but he is still a warrior.

Why would you want to build him full lethality and oneshooting people with R ? (i'm not against various builds but i feel like lethality Jarvan is the only one who is worth to play).

Why when you build him like a fighter (tanky with some dmg), you have less impact than building him like an assassin ? It's dont have sense.

I feel like or you build him full AD like an assassin, or you go full tank. Jarvan isnt a fighter because compared to Irelia, Xin Zhao or Fiora, his dueling abilities are lows.

But the thing is that the character is a fighter actually. What kind of assassin wear a big armor like that ? The shield is so low, yet you look at him with this armor, he should be tanky. Also his kit is made to rush in the melee and engage ennemy team. Everytime i engage with Jarvan, i'm feared because i'm so weak, i know i will die in less than 2 seconds and the shield won't help me at all.

I know the shield is supposed to be stronger when you are surronded by ennemis, but when you are surronded, that means you take more dmg so...

Let's talk about the flag. It's the perfect item to get free assist. Jarvan is like Sona supp : You can do nothing but pressing one spell and get assist easy.

It's your unique way to engage.

But why does it's deal magical dmg ? A flag is made of steel and tissue. Where do you find something magical in steel and tissue ? Logics sometimes...

The AS given is interessting but not for Jarvan. As i said, Jarvan isnt really a fighter, or you build him like a offTank, or you build him Lethality and you will be the assassin.

Jarvan is based on his spells, his AA are pretty weak. With Lethality Jarvan, you kill people with E Q AA + R. You don't need AS for that.

With Tank Jarvan, it's has more utility but AS isnt very powerful on Jarvan. The AS given by the flag is good for your teammates and especially the ADC and the jungler/top laner if he is AD. Not for Jarvan himself.

And the mana cost also...

I don't understand Jarvan passive also, i know it's make more dmg on target on the first hit but i would prefer another passive. 8% actual HP, and it's actual HP, not max HP.

So it's mean that it's deal more dmg when the target is full life. But if i engage the target with E Q, she will have less Hp, and the passive will do less dmg. You see the problem ? It's not helping to duel, in lategame it's completely useless...

Except farming monster or minions, this passive isnt very useful. Maybe in early because yes, at lvl 1 on a full HP target it's surprising but honestly, it's bad.

I feel like the champ is only reliable because of his ultimate and his flag who is helping you to have assist. You don't have big dmg except if you go lethality. You can't tank because you are so weak and your shield is so weak. Mana is a problem too, passive is not useful...

I think we have a problem of identity on Jarvan. Players are building him like an assassin while he is not an assassin (talking about apparence and lore) but his kit is made for that so it's make him a reliable assassin who has big zone physical dmg.

Garen : Garen

Btw, Garen win rate is higher than Jarvan and yet, i find Garen harder to play cause you don't have mobility. With Jarvan, you have E Q, and ulti to reach your ennemies. Here, you have only a little MS boost.

You will laugh but i'm bad as Garen, because everytime i try to play him, i feel like i'm countered. I can't reach ennemy team, i'm zoned... Also, Garen teamfight utility is really near 0. You are a good tank but you don't have other thing to offer to your team.

Your laning is good, on early only and only if you win. Because in that case you will be but useless asf.

Garen is a commander, and he has no interactions with teammates. What do a commander do in real life ? He gives orders to his soldiers, he gives them courage, he give them hope and spirit of fighting.

Yet, Garen has nothing of that. He is just a brainless soldier who spin until his ennemy are death. I don't even feel Garen is a commander. At least Jarvan has a flag who give AS to teammates so you can feel he is a Prince and he gives orders and people follow him. But Garen, not a single teammate interaction while it's his job in Demacia.

His passive is WTF. First, Garen is described as Early game champ, because in late, he is pratically useless so he is mostly early and mid game.

But the passive is strong in late only, hahaha ! So you play an early champ with a lategame passive, which is original...

Same thing for the W that you must stack, it's made to upgrade your lategame but Garen isnt lategame so...

Same thing with the E !! The spell is stronger in lategame but Garen is not a good lategame champ. Also the spell make more dmg when the target is alone, but isnt the concept of this spell is pushing your lane and farming while harassing your opponent ? So you have zone dmg but it's better to use it on a single target which is original too.

Let's be honest, Garen dmg vs Darius dmg.

These two are colossus, these two have similars kits. Yet, Darius in lategame, if good played, will be able to deal serious dmg. While Garen has nothing. Garen will be fighting the ennemy frontlane but his dmg in late aren't good. Your only chance is to get your ulti passive on the frontlane.

Oh, let's talk about the ulti passive. It's so random and i don't think you can balance a champ on a random passive like that.

If you are both 0/0/0 on top lane for example (you and your opponent), if ennemy Caitlyn kill your support, she will get the mark. But she is in bot lane ! How does it's help you ? So you must go in bot lane and kill Caitlyn who is marked ?

If you want your laning opponent to get the passive, you must feed. Yeah, if you are losing your lane, the ennemy will have the mark. But if you are losing, why would you fight ? I mean, if the ennemy darius is 2/0/0, even if he is marked, why would i go on him ? I'm feeding, i'm losing my lane but the mark is on him so it's mean i should fight him and try to kill him with the bonus true dmg.

This passive is just a no sense. Btw, it's would suit Kayle more. Garen isnt a punisher like Kayle. He is a commander. His job is not to punish criminals but to protect and defend Demacia. Kayle on the other side is a punisher. She is the vision of the justice.

This ulti passive is made for Kayle if you think about lore, about personnality, it's the job of Kayle to send justice to criminals. Maybe Caitlyn too. Caitlyn and Kayle are punishers, so having a criminal that you must stop in the game would suit them more than Garen.

Why not simply make the ulti true dmg without passive ? LIke Darius one ? Just reduce the dmg and it's will be fine. Or maybe change it. Why not change the ulti and instead of having a finisher, make something more into Garen job and personnality ?

SUM UP :

Don't get me wrong, i don't think these 2 champs are the worst of the game but i feel like the way you play them don't suit their job, their personnality, their look...

Jarvan with a big armor who is building full lethality and who has a bad shield who can't protect him. The flag who is dealing magic dmg... Has manacost on his spells while he don't use magic.

Garen who is a commander but has no teammates interactions, have a "punish the criminal" while it's would be more suitable for Kayle or Caitlyn, who is early oriented but has a passive, a W and his E who become better in lategame while his utilty is decreasing.

It's my point of view, so i would like to see your point of view on these champs. Does the gameplay reflect their personnality ? Their characters ? Does their look match with the way you play them ?

Thanks for the feedback.

15 Comments

True Garen2 votes

You will laugh but i'm bad as Garen, because everytime i try to play him, i feel like i'm countered. I can't reach ennemy team, i'm zoned... Also, Garen teamfight utility is really near 0. You are a good tank but you don't have other thing to offer to your team.

Garen doesn't have a LOT to offer a teamfight, but he has a bit more than you said. The armourshred is often overlooked. (The silence is single target and doesn't usually seem to bring a lot to teamfights, but it's there.)

Garen tankiness gives him this role in the teamfight: resist burst long enough to reach the carry (presumably the Villain) and Ult him (actively and passively) to death. That's the synergy in Garen's kit, such as it is... no real mobility, but rather to find the right window to use the endurance to get on top of the Villain.

True Garen2 votes

{quoted}

You will laugh but i'm bad as Garen, because everytime i try to play him, i feel like i'm countered. I can't reach ennemy team, i'm zoned... Also, Garen teamfight utility is really near 0. You are a good tank but you don't have other thing to offer to your team.

Your laning is good, on early only and only if you win. Because in that case you will be but useless asf.

His passive is WTF. First, Garen is described as Early game champ, because in late, he is pratically useless so he is mostly early and mid game.

But the passive is strong in late only, hahaha ! So you play an early champ with a lategame passive, which is original...

Same thing for the W that you must stack, it's made to upgrade your lategame but Garen isnt lategame so...

Same thing with the E !! The spell is stronger in lategame but Garen is not a good lategame champ. Also the spell make more dmg when the target is alone, but isnt the concept of this spell is pushing your lane and farming while harassing your opponent ? So you have zone dmg but it's better to use it on a single target which is original too.

Yeah, I don't know who told you that Garen is early game; Garen early game is horrible, his laning is weak.

Garen strong game is levels 11-16. After that he does drop off a little, but not so much, because of Villain mechanic.

Many games Garen just need to stew and play very safe until lvl 11.

...

Commander Identity - you are so close, and you are missing it. Garen is really basic simple kit and mechanics. Garen is a teaching champion who builds adaptively. Playing Garen gives the player the resources to focus on the macro game, without needing to concentrate on dexterity. Good Garen is all about strategy and finding team opportunities.

For this reason, Predator is the rune taken at the highest levels of Garen play.

In low MMR, your teammates cannot be counted on to follow up your plays, so Grasp (or Phase Rush or Glacial Augment) is easier.

The Commander Identity is appropriate because playing Garen should be conducive to learning micro and macro play.

True Garen2 votes

{quoted}

Let's be honest, Garen dmg vs Darius dmg.

These two are colossus, these two have similars kits. Yet, Darius in lategame, if good played, will be able to deal serious dmg. While Garen has nothing.

You have it backwards. Darius is early-game lane bully. Darius scales poorly and if he doesn't get fed early then he will be useless late. Garen scales with practically nothing in the game at all, and a Garen who had a bad early game is considerably more useful than a Darius who had a bad early game. Garen is a FORGIVING champion to play.

(This boards is full of complaints about the enemy Garen who had a horrible early game but Ulted for nearly half of the carry's health from 2 levels below...)

StormBladeMaster2 votes

Ok i see it, yes Garen is so forgiving, the fact that he can have 50 armor and rm just by farming is pretty strong. Also yes, the Villain mecanics deal a lot of dmg to the target.

To me, he is early because of his dmg in early. Garen Q in early deals so much dmg that it's can blow everyone.

I have read all your messages, i agree with you on some thing, i understand your point of view but i don't feel like Garen is a commander by his kit.

But i agree on the fact that he should stay an easy champ to play for beginners. Maybe Garen would be better if the dmg on the game was reduced. Assassins, adc, even somes tanks like Tahm, deals so much dmg and we don't have time to fight. Fights are very fast and stressful.

Maybe in another meta, i would appreciate Garen more, if you know what i'm saying.

True Garen2 votes

{quoted}

Oh, let's talk about the ulti passive. It's so random and i don't think you can balance a champ on a random passive like that.

If you are both 0/0/0 on top lane for example (you and your opponent), if ennemy Caitlyn kill your support, she will get the mark. But she is in bot lane ! How does it's help you ? So you must go in bot lane and kill Caitlyn who is marked ?

If you want your laning opponent to get the passive, you must feed. Yeah, if you are losing your lane, the ennemy will have the mark. But if you are losing, why would you fight ? I mean, if the ennemy darius is 2/0/0, even if he is marked, why would i go on him ? I'm feeding, i'm losing my lane but the mark is on him so it's mean i should fight him and try to kill him with the bonus true dmg.

This passive is just a no sense. Btw, it's would suit Kayle more. Garen isnt a punisher like Kayle. He is a commander. His job is not to punish criminals but to protect and defend Demacia. Kayle on the other side is a punisher. She is the vision of the justice.

This ulti passive is made for Kayle if you think about lore, about personnality, it's the job of Kayle to send justice to criminals. Maybe Caitlyn too. Caitlyn and Kayle are punishers, so having a criminal that you must stop in the game would suit them more than Garen.

Why not simply make the ulti true dmg without passive ? LIke Darius one ? Just reduce the dmg and it's will be fine. Or maybe change it. Why not change the ulti and instead of having a finisher, make something more into Garen job and personnality ?

That is NOT how the Villain mechanic works. In order for your laner to acquire the mark he would have to roam, or at least kill your jungler in a gank. Kills against Garen do NOT count towards the Villain calculation.

Also, you underestimate just how strong the Villain mechanic is. Garen can 1v1 most Villain even from 2 levels below. You just described the single situation where Garen has a shot at beating Darius in lane.

And again, exploiting Villain opportunities is partly why Predator rune is good on Garen. Garen is perhaps the only non-jungler who uses that Rune. This is also partly why DMP is a core item on Garen.

Garen is half-tank/half-assassin.

Phieldworker1 votes

Honestly I would like a mini rework to Jarvan. I really like him but I feel with his numbers her has a bit of an identity crisis. They have him classed as a tank but he fights more like a bruiser with diver aspects. He can build full damage and have good output still. Some clarity to what he’s supposed to be needs to be flushed out.

StormBladeMaster1 votes

Yeah, he dont really have an identity. His look make him look like a tank but nothing on his kit help him to tank. He is like a tank assassin, i dont know how to explain it.

RavenMagus1 votes

Jarvan is top cancer any time he's good

He's just one of those bruiser-assassins that dash into your lane and kill you instantly, like Vi does.

StormBladeMaster1 votes

Well, it's because of lethality build. Tank Jarvan can't kill you instantly. And that what i'm talking about. He shouldnt be like that because he dont look like an assassin.

I mean, his shield has a HP ratio but it's so small, i tought it's was supposed to encourage players to play him tank but it's so ridiculous that everyone prefers play him as an assassin. And that why he is cancerr.

It's like Taliyah jungle. At start, it's was supposed to be a mid laner, but people has found other way to play her, they discovered it's was way better and so... Taliyah isnt cancer, but her jungle role is.

Jarvan is not cancer but if he is builded like an assassin, he will because you can't dogde ulti dmg and he will simply destroy you.

How to balance a champ when he can have different builds ? It's hard.

MorganFreemanBot1 votes

JarvanIV Has had numerous periods where he's been a nightmarishly strong jungler. In fact he was recently nerfed for being noticeably above the power curve and having a disproportionate representation, despite not quite being THE king of the jungle.

Garen Is supposed to be a 'starter' champ. He has clear strengths and weaknesses, and sacrifices some depth & playmaking for simplicity and consistency.

They're both fine.

StormBladeMaster1 votes

I disagree. It's not because Jarvan have been strong in Jungle, that he is fine. It's not because you can win with a champ that he is fine. He is problematic because lethality stuff make him overpowered and without counterplay (that why he was almost King of the jungle, because of this stuff ! How many Jarvan where building this a few months ago ?) . He can easy reach backline and delete it with this build.

While he isnt supposed to be like that because he is rated as a tank. But he is bad at tanking because the shield is so low, he can barely survive, even with a tank build.

For me, there is a problem with the champ, his identity is to be a tank/fighter and we have an assassin. If he is strong in a role that he shouldnt have, then it's a problem no ? What do you think of Taliyah jungle ? It's was problematic. This is the same way.

Garen is a starter champ yes, but that does not mean he should be weak and coherence. You are playing a commander and you don't have allies interactions... You are early but you have late upgrades like E, W and passive... He is the worst Juggernaut (if we exclude Mordekaiser but Mordekaiser is going to be rework so).

Garen is fine for starters players but i'm sure we can add more complexcity and make him interessing and less boring. Every champ need to have love.

And i'm sure we can keep the "easy side" of Garen but make him more powerful and more coherent about his personnality, his job, his lore...

MetalGearTeemo1 votes

all the issues you describe for jarvan are present and worse in Camille.

StormBladeMaster1 votes

Well, Camille is an assassin, so if she can delete your backline, it's her job. But i agree that she is tankier than a normal assassin.

Camille is an assassin but have a bruiser build. J4 is a tank but have assassin build.

It's same problem but reversed lol.

Edit : it's because Camille is played in Top lane that she get a bruiser build. There no way you can play a true assassin with full lethality in top lane. If Camille was played in mid, she would be less problematic.

MetalGearTeemo2 votes

Starter Character

I hate this excuse. Dota2 manages to keep its simple kits competitive with more complex kits.

League leans on this crutch to the point of breaking. Do not excuse poor balance design for "accessibility"

Modl Ryden l1 votes

I wouldn't say either are forgotten. Both are, I would argue, poster children of the game. Jarvan IV is influential and often picked in competitive match. Whether it's ranked or esports, J4 stays relevant in all metas.

Garen on the other hand is the one the many cover champs to League of Legends in ads and memes. You may not see him in many games because there are more interesting champs to go after when you're done playing the affordable champs, albeit the 'tutorial' champions.

More from Gameplay

More by StormBladeMaster