Boards›Gameplay

Early Surrender

Shieldbro·5/18/2017, 5:04:45 PM·2 votes·8,629 views

Since I can't login to comment on patch notes, I'll do it here. Unanimous surrender at 15 will almost never happen, even if eveyrone knows it's lost someone will have never surrender attitude or just troll to waste everyone's time. I suggest you make it 4 votes for surrender and add a condition if the enemy has 10 more kills and 2 more turrets, or just 15 kills, something like that. Another thought is that higher the rank less likely the surrender for stupid reasons, say bronze and silver players may want to surrender after 1 death or after just a 5 death lead(happens in plat too but much much less). Also the turnover rate is higher as in lower ranks even the 15 deaths lead can be lost with overstaying or reckless diving. So what I'm saying is, higher ranked players know when the game is lost hard even in the 10th min and are less negative hence they know there is at least a ~20% chance for winning, any less than that is better to surrender. Here's another one, if a player voted nay/yes 20 times in a row(including each game's multiple votes) he can't vote for the next 5 games. Uh hope someone is reading this, those are really good suggestions.

14 Comments

NinjaGuy695/18/2017, 5:08:06 PM2 votes

You guys have servers in EUNE? I thought it was just polar bears and moose playing League, not actual humans.

Jbels5/18/2017, 5:27:56 PM2 votes

What the fuck is a EUNE?

Anastaecia5/18/2017, 6:07:59 PM2 votes

Had someone dc before they even had any cs, but no remake option. Had another rage quit at about 1450 because they were feeding. OH, 15m surrender. Had no trouble getting me and 2 other votes.

This is the type of thing it was designed for more than 5 people wanting to quit, although if all 5 do, there you go.

tC0gzVJ6rF5/18/2017, 5:09:28 PM1 votes

This is meant for High elo games where they can actually tell when it is an Open mid game. Nobody cares about low Elo

Dragfin5/18/2017, 5:48:55 PM1 votes

{quoted}

Since I can't login to comment on patch notes, I'll do it here. Unanimous surrender at 15 will almost never happen, even if eveyrone knows it's lost someone will have never surrender attitude or just troll to waste everyone's time. I suggest you make it 4 votes for surrender and add a condition if the enemy has 10 more kills and 2 more turrets, or just 15 kills, something like that. Another thought is that higher the rank less likely the surrender for stupid reasons, say bronze and silver players may want to surrender after 1 death or after just a 5 death lead(happens in plat too but much much less). Also the turnover rate is higher as in lower ranks even the 15 deaths lead can be lost with overstaying or reckless diving. So what I'm saying is, higher ranked players know when the game is lost hard even in the 10th min and are less negative hence they know there is at least a ~20% chance for winning, any less than that is better to surrender. Here's another one, if a player voted nay/yes 20 times in a row(including each game's multiple votes) he can't vote for the next 5 games. Uh hope someone is reading this, those are really good suggestions.

No, but to be fair, your post is not going to be the first post whining and bitching about it and that is all on the lack of common sense that RIOT has for allowing it in the first place. It will also create more in game toxicity. My guess is that RIOT DGAF about creating more toxicity because like I said, they lack the common sense when they release stupid things such as this in the first place.