It all makes sense now

Salron·May 2, 2017·54 votes·2,575 views

Cait nerfs are being held off until after the skin comes out She's also receiving indirect buffs in tonights patch I see your game Riot

71 Comments

Succubús GFMay 2, 20176 votes

II dont think ive seen a Sivir Cassiopeia Evelynn skin recently but yes lets give cait another skin >:(

THE RlVER KlNGMay 2, 20173 votes

and Fizz won't be nerfed until after the Omega Squad skin comes out despite him literally just getting Super Galaxy a few months ago

MavenSongMay 2, 201720 votes

SG Fizz was a year ago dude. May 26, 2016

THE RlVER KlNGMay 2, 20173 votes

Shut the fuck up lmao

Yorick, Cass, Swain, Victor, Shen, Heimerdinger, etc. have all gone 3+ years without a skin, alongside many others. Fizz getting one, especially when Riot brainlessly buffed him into god tier top, is a disgrace.

Champions who have gotten a skin within the last year should automatically be disqualified from getting a skin, unless they are new.

Or relatively new champs like Tahm, Illaoi, Taliyah, ASol who deserve skins waaaay more than Fizz with his seven. Fucking Ekko and Jhin are allowed to get skins back to back but everyone else apparently can suck it in Riot's eyes.

MavenSongMay 2, 201725 votes

I correct you on one thing and you go off. I was just correcting your blatant perversion of the facts.

THE RlVER KlNGMay 2, 20173 votes

You offer an statistic that doesn't make up for anything and then act like you have some form of high ground

Your entire 'correction' is easily torn apart by a simple comparison to several dozen champions

MavenSongMay 2, 201717 votes

My comment was to correct your incorrect statement that Fizz's last skin was:

[{quoted}](name=THE RlVER KlNG,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=XlblPEAA,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2017-05-02T21:27:59.658+0000)

a few months ago

All i said was that was actually back in may of last year.

My correction cant be torn apart because its a fact. You are trying to change this into a topic of "who should be getting skins" when i was talking about nothing of the such. Youre trying to entirely warp the subject. You are making an argument over nothing.

http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/d0/d0564adb1a8c71bc6e38d54f9072e96f73c165c3b44a55f01a701556d57a6c87.jpg

THE RlVER KlNGMay 2, 20172 votes

Sorry I don't ascribe to your level of inane semantics then...?

A year is a few months, just the same as a week is a few days or a month is a few weeks

You're the only one here warping the subject

MavenSongMay 2, 201711 votes

Pray tell, how am i warping the subject?

also

Few: a small number of.

12 months (by the time the supposed skin will be released) is not small.

THE RlVER KlNGMay 2, 20172 votes

Few is subjective and the word itself has evolved to mean any unknown quantity. Twelve is a few compared to twenty four. If you had four items that are rare, then four would be many, not a few.

You're arguing semantics. A few months can be a year in the same way a few cookies can be a dozen, or a bakers dozen.

MavenSongMay 2, 201710 votes

While few can be comparative most dont consider 12 whole months to be a few.

Also you havnt explained how im warping the subject.

Troll for TrumpMay 4, 20171 votes

and Fizz won't be nerfed until after the Omega Squad skin comes out despite him literally just getting Super Galaxy a few months ago

He's making a sarcastic comment about Fizz's state of balance, and how Riot won't do anything about it because of the leaked out upcoming skin.

The original correction doesn't really correlate to that, but arguing about that irrelevant point just further detracts from the original comment.

And then going on another tangent WITHIN that tangent makes it even further off from the original comment.

VoidzillaMay 3, 201710 votes

Love how quickly this devolved. Person A states something wrong, Person B makes a simple correction of that statement. Person A then goes on and on about a tangent because they can't admit that they're wrong.

This is like if Kellyanne Conway posted on these boards.

THE RlVER KlNGMay 3, 20171 votes

Person A makes a statement

Person B hops on his ass to correct him using semantics to try and look cool

Person A calls him out on his bullshit and expands upon his original point while people make ad hominem attacks and fail to address the original point at hand - Exhibit #78 of this right above.

ChaoticPineconeMay 3, 20177 votes

"ad hominem"

Lol. You could have easily just responded by saying, "Whoops - was a few months off. Still, its comparatively recent considering that Cass, Yorick, and dozens of others havent had new skins for years, and I think youd agree that he wont receive any nerfs until they run out of skin ideas on him."

That way you concede a minor point and still retain your major point. Instead you got hung up on a minor point.

Its not semantics. A few is a small number. As to your "comparative few" argument, you might be onto something if there wasnt the word "year". If you have 12 months, you dont call that a few - you call that a year. Since there is a term that has a definite length of time attributed to it and is used for longer periods of time (until you get to decades, centuries, or millennia), "few" has to be a small number compared to your longer measurement, not "equal to or around". In fact, your entire argument that 12 months is "a few" is arguing over semantics.

AnidanMay 3, 20177 votes

This thread bit here is a whole new level for me. How does this all happen off the back of a minor correction? I've seen some really, really absurd forum arguments in the past but this is something else. This is some "bringing real life frustration/angst into it" level.

Not saying you're partaking much in the argument, I just needed to place this comment.. somewhere, anywhere.

THE RlVER KlNGMay 3, 20171 votes

Done with this discussion anyway, all of it was a waste of time and half the people here are just typing out inane insults with no contribution whatsoever.

JackMcSnipeyzMay 3, 20176 votes

Lol dude you're so full of shit, you got downvoted for blowing up for no reason over a mistake YOU made. Just admit you're wrong. or dont, i just find your whole "it's a prespective thing" a pathetic way to make yourself look right.

DuskDaUmbreonMay 3, 20173 votes

You literately told him to "shut the fuck up, when he corrected you on one point. You then devolved it into an argument about who got what skin when. And you dare to say you "called him out on his bullshit", when you keep having to make shit up to sound relevant?

THE RlVER KlNGMay 3, 20171 votes

oh look another lost soul who thinks he even understand what's going on and spews the same trite nonsense everyone else has

the only people making shit up are the ones comparing me to kellyanne conway, calling me a snowflake, or continuing to argue pointless semantics

boo hoo how dare you necro a dead and meaningless discussion on a post written and commented on by several nonsensical hypocrites

DuskDaUmbreonMay 4, 20172 votes

It's not "necking", the post is literately only two days old (and only about one when I commented). I'm not comparing you to anyone but yourself and the person you were a jackass to, you're the one comparing yourself to people you find undesirable, and you're the one throwing crap like "special snowflakes" around. In fact, I had argued against the only person to call you that, because it's childish and stifles discussion.

And nobody here but you is being a hypocrite. You're saying we're arguing semantics, but you're the only one doing so. I stated an indisputable fact (about you being a jackass to someone stating an indisputable fact), and you went off on me.

And, yes, I have actually read every comment here, and I do understand each and every single one. You were a jackass to someone who corrected a part of your comment (which was really, at its true core, nothing but crying about your main not getting a skin), and you kept trying to defend your incorrect stance. You're like B.O.B saying the earth is flat to literately every scientist in the world.

TyrekGoldenspearMay 3, 201710 votes

Dude even if you were arguing semantics, in what universe would someone say a few months instead of saying a year?

You're only making yourself look worse and worse as you scramble to make yourself look right.

THE RlVER KlNGMay 3, 20172 votes

The only people who look bad here are the ones attacking me with ad hominem instead of minding their fucking business.

Its actually less than a year, about eleven months actually. So MavenSong isn't even correct, if he wants to argue actual specifics.

Meanwhile I get downvoted for telling some calendar Nazi, who can't even bother to find a good argument, off.

TyrekGoldenspearMay 3, 20179 votes

Dude... 11 months is still not a "few months".

Heck, people will sooner round it up to a year in typical speech instead of saying a few months.

Becuase one is more accurate.

Besides, nice job calling somebody pointing out a mistake of yours a nazi and flying of the handle when they weren't even being rude in their reply.

Besides. You're the only one here that doesn't understand this becuase if you were paying attention, Maven pointed out that Fizz's last skin was a year ago, not a few months ago like your original comment attests. Now you're all in a huff about sementics and arguing with him about it.

Let it go dude. I know your original comment was about some champs getting skins over others, but that wasn't the point of Maven's reply.

MavenSongMay 3, 20176 votes

And I even stated "by the time the skin would be announced/released" in a later comment clarifying it would be a year by that point. Idk. Im just wasting energy arguing him :p

THE RlVER KlNGMay 3, 20171 votes

Congrats you wasted a good portion of my night as well

Ashen RiderMay 3, 20174 votes

I think you wasted your own night.

TyrekGoldenspearMay 3, 20173 votes

You get an upvote for the high ground meme.

SalronMay 2, 201710 votes

You said something incorrect He corrected you End of story. There is nothing more to say here

THE RlVER KlNGMay 2, 20171 votes

'Incorrect'

Says the guy whose thread is entirely speculatory and based on opinion

Nice job

MavenSongMay 2, 20176 votes

whether or not the thread is wrong or right is irrelevant. Your comment is the Topic of the argument, not the thread itself.

THE RlVER KlNGMay 2, 20171 votes

By that logic whether or not you perceive me to be wrong or right is irrelevant....?

Even then I wasn't wrong, you focused in on semantics. Do you even read before you hit post?

MavenSongMay 2, 20178 votes

My comment was about your comment and that is what this entire argument is about... so yes its quite relevant. By comparison you were talking about the thread itself which is not relevant to my simple correction.

[{quoted}](name=THE RlVER KlNG,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=XlblPEAA,comment-id=000300000000000000000001000000000000,timestamp=2017-05-02T23:45:27.042+0000)

Do you even read before you hit post?

i could ask you the same.

THE RlVER KlNGMay 3, 20171 votes

You say whether or not the thread is wrong or right is irrelevant without giving any explanation as to why, and then base your entire argument off the arrogant, semantic assumption that I am wrong and you are right.

Hypocrisy much?

MavenSongMay 3, 20175 votes

Not really, no.

LauchmelderMay 3, 20171 votes

He's not exactly wrong though. Riot should just put a bit more work into thinking up a fitting skin theme for champions that didn't get a skin in a long time. Hell, I'd be fine if they just adapted a fanmade skin.

MavenSongMay 3, 20171 votes

i never said he was wrong about certain champions being neglected skins, but the whole point of my comment was correcting him and he went on a tangent.

Laughing FishMay 2, 201712 votes

https://images.rapgenius.com/a3f8ceda57bf0e7f09f03f8416aa0220.500x281x15.gif

Skins ProjectMay 3, 20176 votes

Swim fish! Run!

There's too much salt in these waters!

Swim back to the freshwater lands of M&G where you can live your life out in safety!

THE RlVER KlNGMay 3, 20171 votes

There are a lot of Laughing Fish gameplay posts that are even funnier than your gifs, you know.

Swim back to Memes and Games.

NastyMcOutplayMay 3, 20171 votes

i agree, i hate that gif poster

GrReaper96May 3, 20174 votes

Wow my snowflake alert is going off the chart!!!
Are you OK? Do you need a safe place because words hurt?

THE RlVER KlNGMay 3, 20172 votes

How long did it take you to come up with that eight-year-old response?

DracocrashMay 3, 20177 votes

TFW you don't have a come back, so you just make fun of the other persons come back.

DuskDaUmbreonMay 3, 20172 votes

I'm not gonna lie, it was a pretty crappy comeback. Oversone and obnoxious. Kinda like the target of his comeback.

An Undead bratMay 3, 20172 votes

I stand by your side and agree with your points, just so you know.

THE RlVER KlNGMay 3, 20171 votes

[slayer-pantheon-thumbs]

Supreme Senpai69May 3, 20176 votes

I think most people would agree with his points if he presented them in a manner that didn't sound like a 12 year old.... so rude for no reason. Presentation is almost everything and being an asshat is gonna get you downvotes regardless of content.

Troll for TrumpMay 4, 20173 votes

People shouldn't be judged off the presentation, but the points they make.

That's why you have showboats like Hitler or Trump or whatnot taking power, because they can present things well.

If you're really confident, the amount of things you can just spew out is insane.

Supreme Senpai69May 4, 20171 votes

I more meant people might agree with him, but instead they have to downvote him because he's being an absolute ass. And they reply with "Wow stop being an ass" instead of "Wow I agree with your points." People shouldn't be judged on the presentation but rather on the points, you're right, but presentation is still pretty much everything. It's just human nature honestly.