One For All is great and all, but could we change the way a champion gets chosen?

Lauchmelder·8/4/2018, 8:29:28 PM·1 votes·664 views

4 people (premades mostly) shouldn't get an 80% chance on their champion. If only 2 different champions get picked the chance should be 50% for each champion, not 80/20, 60/40 or whatever.

And I'm saying that not because I never get my pick, I'm saying that because I've seen this shyte happen too many times. Just because a friend and I get into a lobby with another 2 man premades and 1 random shouldn't mean the random has a lower chance at getting his champion (because in theory it's 40/40/10)

5 Comments

Elisheva8/4/2018, 8:37:14 PM1 votes

I mean.. that is the only fair way. Riot wants you to find likeminded players and add them after all.

rawiazam18/4/2018, 8:51:39 PM1 votes

we live in a democratic world where the majority choses.

to be serious: what if 4 people are not premade? but they want a certain champion, this isn't fair that someone who wants 5 zilean which isn't so fun to play wins vs 4

Firebeard8/4/2018, 10:09:11 PM1 votes

Sounds pretty Marxist to me. Imagine you are with some friends and the 4 of you are dying to try out mundo one for all, but the 5th want's skarnar. Would you really want it to fall down to a coin flip? Equality of opportunity > equality of outcome