@Rito Genuine question about DFG removal?
Okay so, it seems to me that one of the primary reasons for DFG being removed was that the burst was too high for champions (specifically assassins) whose bursts were already high in the first place.
Why then is Fizz getting the exact same bonus to his ult now? Isn't that entirely counter productive? Fizz already has a pretty high burst, removing DFG but adding the passive to his ult accomplishes absolutely nothing. Actually, it does, it lets Fizz get the bonus of the DFG with one less item. >.>
DFG was removed, Ahri's damage amplification was removed, why then go completely against this style for Fizz?
I play Ahri, I play Fizz, I play Kat. I buy DFG on every single one of them. But I just find this extremely unfair.
Could someone from Riot provide a better explanation for this decision? It just doesn't make sense to me.
Thanks!