Or is it just me? If anything all it did was make Warriors and Cinderhulk junglers stronger. Maybe if it did 3% max health on hit magic damage it would be better. But that's just my initial impression given how 3% max health on hit physical damage is negated by armor. That's without Lord Dominik's of course. Speaking of shred, BOTRK is also...eh.
Thoughts?
SonaTitsAndAss2 votesno it is weak. for the onhit damage alone your looking to face a tank with 3000 health... to match just sateds on hit damage... no proc... and also its in ad now not mr and the is alot more armor then mr.. so its even weaker vs those 3000 health so you have to look at even higher health champions in the 4000 and 5000 health and those are kind of rare ...like a generic tank these days has about 3500 health 200ish armor 200ish mr and then like a fat 10% health sheild which it doesnt scale with. so if we pretend it has sated old passive... then we are looking at a 4000 tank to match the damage... lets not day dream and expect the fact we are losing a passive which literally buffs some champions damage like shyvanas and yi by 40% and then... yeah shits weak as fuck
Slack King1 votesbut now you can stack bloodrazor and BoTrk
Umbra Z1 votesDont forget the new guinsoos along with bork and bloodrazor
KING ATTILA1 votesDont forget the new guinsoos along with bork and bloodrazor
Guinsoos was nerfed and is hella expensive. Getting botrk and guinsoos just to even make Bloodrazor feel impactful doesn't seem efficient at all.
Umbra Z1 votesClam down man im just expressing my ideas anyway if you need to shred tanks i believe that would work well and with the tank meta reaching its peak tank killers would be insanely usefull (emphasis on believe)