Has anyone done the math on overlapping Unique passives? Is the Inefficiency Just to Much?

ParanoidNoc·3/1/2020, 4:36:14 AM·1 votes·2,093 views

I accidentally built and on a few games ago and it actually felt pretty good. I know I'm missing out on the second 10% haste but it felt pretty decent my damage was on curve and I got both proc and seraphs shield which the second lost chapter item really increased. I've also wondered about this on + Bruisers love all those stats and it has to be very close to gold efficient even without the second ?rage? passive. wouldn't a like both vs say a tank match up? Maybe this is my silver brain and I'm not saying do this every game but couldn't it work in some especially heavy farm lanes/games?

5 Comments

PopcornBunni3/1/2020, 6:22:47 AM2 votes

item 3071 is 100% gold efficient even without any of its passives. The problem building both item 3078 is that the component item 3044 is one of the least cost effective items without the benefit of its passive, and there's not really a way to build around that limitation before the final item.

The real awful shit for redundant passives is in the item 3082 line. If you don't rush item 3110 before one of the others, it's just straight wasted gold on an already inefficient stat compared to the AD your opponent has. And building FH first is horrible because that extra armor is pointless without health to back it up before hand.

Trias0003/1/2020, 5:09:10 AM1 votes

According to wiki, 10% CDR is worth 267 gold.

OMGSoAnnoying3/1/2020, 6:23:20 AM1 votes

It would depend which items are crossing uniques.

Dorans Pants3/1/2020, 2:12:40 PM1 votes

{quoted}

I accidentally built and on a few games ago ...

I think you meant: "I accidentally picked Ziggs ."