So I see a lot of claims and no evidence
For example
"Tanks don't do anything" "Grievous Wounds is op why would you bring it back" "To be frank, Miss Fortune still is the most lackluster ADC of the bunch" "Mages are useless this patch"
Good mix of tanks, healers, Miss Fortune and mages.
Okay so I cherrypicked the claims that directly conflict with this evidence, but the point still stands. Is it not hard to look up statistics before coming to a conclusion to the matter? I mean, some arguments are qualitative and are still relatively fine without data to support it (such as instead of saying GW is op, say that the current AD item that grants it feels overwhelmingly biased towards stat checking the opponent instead of outplaying them), and I can accept and agree with those threads perfectly fine, but if you're going to make a discussion based on evidence reliant fact based statements, shouldn't you be ready to put your money where your mouth is and actually show proof that your claim is true?
