ARAM isn't ARAM with bans

ClatoVerataNicto·4/14/2019, 8:38:49 PM·6 votes·2,377 views

I appreciate the attempt, but putting bans in ARAM is very counter-intuitive. When I play ARAM I want a chance at playing any champ against any champ. Sometimes I get the super strong and sometimes I'm against them. It was part of the fun.

A much better solution would be to make every champion available in ARAM so that everyone has an equal chance and the fabled ARAM accounts would be rendered useless.

15 Comments

Kai Guy4/14/2019, 8:52:52 PM8 votes

Aram is never Aram with out all champions unlocked, you are correct.

ZapMyHeart4/15/2019, 5:38:45 AM2 votes

That solution is way too simple and straightforward for Rito to implement!

Snark aside, financially speaking, Rito would be doing their coffers a diservice if they completely alienate all their ARAM-account players. At least the bans allows the rest of us to have a little breathing room at banning certain champions and making the games a bit more balanced.

Light deus4/18/2019, 1:17:12 AM2 votes

Im tired of seeing lux, xerath, varus every game in a "random" mode. I much rather have bans.

BigBellBrute4/16/2019, 5:01:30 AM1 votes

So call it BARAM.

Blazingflares4/18/2019, 1:05:07 AM1 votes

It might just be me, but when I get the same champs in the span of a few games (although not bad champs), I can't help but doubt the "random" in ARAM, smh

While I do like the idea of bans, I'm fine with not having them if all champions are unlocked and it really is random.