Honestly man, I'm a little confused by your posts. You're saying all these things that just don't make sense. I think you're just throwing out platitudes and words that, some how, you don't know the meaning of (you don't seem to know what double standards are, don't know what hypocrisy is, didn't get the "uneducated" joke). Is English not your first language? I'll try to speak in a simpler fashion to accommodate your poor comprehension (I'm not trying to insult you, I genuinely think you aren't comprehending these things) Arguing with you is a little bit of a hassle but I'll do my best.
The uneducated part was a joke that clearly flew over your head. Moving on though.
No, it's not hypocritical to say that taunting in league is a double standard. Hypocrisy is claiming one thing when really the opposite is true. For one thing, I never said I don't taunt people. I love taunting people in fact. Also, I wasn't "taunting" him, I was criticizing him for how soft he's being. Two different things. I even gave him advice on what to do so as far as I'm concerned it was constructive criticism. I trust you can Google the definition of "double standard", re-read my previous paragraph and figure out where you're wrong there as well. That's homework.
I'm trying really really hard to understand your garbled sentences, so bear with me here.
It is cyberbullying and the notion that you shouldn't be who you are because that doesnt conform to the likes of your enemies and teamates.
See, now this is a good example of a double standard. On the one hand, you're telling me that part of the social epidemic is that you cannot be yourself because "you must conform to the likes of your enemies and team mates", but on the other hand you're telling me that my taunting people in good fun is part of the social epidemic. That's who I am. It doesn't seem to conform to the likes of some of my enemies, and that's kind of the point, but then why is that not also part of the "social epidemic" (lmao)?
The guidelines do not disallow taunting. The game mechanically encourages it.
If he wants to see his enemies input as something greater / more meaningful, whose to say can't without being identified as a victim.
What? So you want to ban taunting or something because you want the enemy to ONLY say things like "Good job!" "Wow, well played!" "Here is some advice on how to beat me;" "Lel le meme we can all laugh at lelelelel"
How about we just make things simple and give everyone a cue card of approved phrases? How about we delete the chatbox and just bind certain Riot/Community approved phrases to F1-F9? That'll eliminate toxicity, I bet! It'll also eliminate most social elements from the game and leave it an empty fucking husk because the overwhelmingly sensitive are apparently entitled to all of our attention if they stand up and say "I'm offended!"
League needs less players who simply ignore toxic behavior. I'm guessing you're one of those people that see the problem and ignore it or label it and slap an excuse on it.
I think you're confusing toxic behavior with taunts, mate. They're two different things. Professional athletes taunt each other. Kids taunt each other. Friends taunt each other. Calling someone a filthy n!gger jew cock lover degenerate who should kill himself immediately is toxic behavior. Saying someone sucks at the champion they're playing, or that you're better than them, or that this game is easy, is a taunt.
But whatever. You don't really have to argue your case, poor of a case as you're making. Riot's on your side, you know. They'll keep listening to you gerbils whining about every little perceived slight someone sends your way, crying that it's the reason League is becoming a worse game and it's really the reason you're still in bronze or silver or whatever. And they're going to continue to neuter this game until it's a kiddie playground with rainbow arches and superficial smiles on everyone's faces while tyrannical overlords point ban guns at their heads and make sure everyone is getting along nicely, or else.
When this game is a rotting fucking husk devoid of any life or lively players throwing a jest about, you'll have yourselves and your strangling politically accurate bandwagon attitude to blame.
so he would stop dying to 
? You can't look at one instance of someone laning against one out of the THOUSANDS of players and say that they suck. You need data, controlled experiments, statements from official sources...
