I'm glad you at least took the time create a post explaining your opinion, although i don't think it effectively accomplishes much. I will try to explain why. NOTE: Skip to the to TL:DR if you want the short version(which i recommend).
I will first start off by saying i provided the link with data compiled from platinum rank matches and above. http://champion.gg/champion/Darius I also included Taric and the video as a joke(granted SoloQ magic is a thing). **Note: **I have a portion to the bottom talking about the stats, and usefulness(or lack of) in greater detail towards the bottom!
The big problem i have is your entire post largely only validates my own(we seem to be in agreement over a great many things hilariously enough). For example you stated Tryndamere is an RNG machine... which is exactly my point. Tryndamere is OBJECTIVELY MORE binary than Darius, and takes even less effort to win lane with. Which the post i was replying to stated, Darius "always wins against melee, and is to binary". I stated why Tryndamere is even worse, and completely disproves the "beats everything melee" superlative(more so then Pantheon even, as he is entirely melee and has no poke). Its magnified by the fact Tryndamere will actually lose lanes for the exact same reasons, as he's entirely reliant on rolling natural 20s as it were. Him being more annoying than Darius is entirely subjective, and i'm inclined to think this... especially because he's just going to splitpush ALL game, and he does so quickly.
You stated Fiora is a lane losing machine(I think shes rubbish as well), but also completely agreed with me that she is indeed more faceroll. Fiora can and will win beat Darius at his OWN game. You then went on to how she will be repeatedly ganked, for the very same reasons that make Darius himself a weak champion, which i stated in my previous post. I also agree she is prone to being ganked, and i DON'T believe alot of these picks are any good, for the reasons we have both mentioned. I also figured someone would say something about the viability of the picks, however you have to take in mind Darius himself is NOT viable currently or in meta. My point was simply to disprove said superlative, that so many hold to be an undeniably fact... in which it clearly isn't. I'm also clarifying that there are indeed champions with worse designs. Fiora herself is getting reworked for this reason.
"Rumble has a largely ranged kit", i agree and stated he was technically melee in parentheses, as i also did with Zed and Yorick. None of which will engage him in melee combat directly, all of which win through doing so. It technically IS cheating by my own rules, so i can respect that you called me out on that.
You state that Riven is a problematic champion herself. Of which i agree, however this has nothing to do whatsoever with the subject matter at hand. Furthemore you again did not even present a counterargument, other than you believe Darius will out stat her in a match up. I stated it was a skill match up, which according to data Riven generally wins. She can beat him pre-6 with the strength of her abilities, and she can also lose pre-6. Not much more to say.
I took a shot at the you and others, when i mentioned Irelia. As i am annoyed by the constant whining, and used her as another example of a champion that will beat Darius by the mid to late game. However its evidently only important to the people that they win early, and not the complete lane or game. This once again contradicts my own rules, however i did so intentionally.
You state some players have niche picks such as my former example of Blem's Lee top, and we can't necessarily reproduce this success. This is mostly true as we can't expect to just learn their playstyle over night, however this isn't a good reason as to not learn how this works, and it doesn't mean it can't or won't work should someone try it. Even if we are talking about Lee sin which is by most accounts one of the more difficult champion to pick up and learn. However it has to be again mentioned. Lee can not only defeat Darius pre-6, he can avoid ganks easily, sustain in lane, scales far better, etc. The fact he is melee and wins early(provided he is being played right of course), puts him within the parameters used in the discussion; still proving my point.
You eventually take a shot at my rank(or lack there of), which is both a waste of time and completely redundant. Regardless of elo a point is neither proven nor dis proven on this basis, as elo has nothing to do with the legitimacy of a balance discussion. You could be ranked #1 in the world or 10 million, it doesn't make your points any more or less valid.
Finally you state overall game stats are pointless as they don't prove or deny the frustration players go through while facing a particular champion. You of course are right about this, however it still doesn't disprove the points made in my previous posts, or what i was really going for. If the subject OP presented was "IS Darius annoying to lane against"? Well that is completely subjective, and i personally don't mind him. Of course i'm aware many do find him annoying. Finally where are we even going with this? This started over counterpicks and champion balance, moved to a specific champions design, where i started by making humorous points and examples to disprove superlatives... now we're arguing over how we should feel, when it's not a valid basis for a reasonable argument? Although i appreciate the stat joke it was quite clever. Oh and don't worry i'll talk to Riot about adding an "annoying bar" to gauge that stat, as it is evidently all that matters... and of course Darius will have a 10/10. However i'm not sure that's the best reason to hold something against a champion, especially when they're not even the best at what they do. I guess where gonna have to agree to disagree. Even if you got this far... read the TL:DR.
**TL:DR ** Lets actually just agree to disagree, as we clearly agree on most points. The conflict is largely from a subjective standpoint. We can't exactly argue how you're supposed to feel about lane bullies... unless you have a degree in psychology? Either way with out the superlatives there isn't much left to talk about.