got their E nerfed. 
's biggest rival is . After those nerfs she just dominates the enchanter support meta. Most people are fine with it because the support meta is dominated with shit like 
. Instead of giving him nerfs Rito gives nerfs to her. This is an outrage. They can 
ulti AD scaling hard for PBE but wanna nerf Nami. Brilliant. Just brilliant bitches
Frosted Tips6 votesNami has been slightly too strong for a long time. Don't even get me started on Janna. She is the most broken Solo Q champion ever. She should be reworked. Also champions in the same class should not be counters. The counter pick to a champion should for the most part be a different class because if only enchanters counter enchanters then you get a meta of only enchanters.
Mobile Phone5 votesWhat do you mean something like ali has dominated supports? Nami has literally sat at a 53-54% winrate since last november other than for like 1 patch. PLEASE justify why nami has been #1-3 top winrates for the entire season. Like people cant bring up something like graves who has been the literal definition of aids this season but then just gloss over someone who has consistently been a higher winrate than him the entire time.
Hayaishi3 votesRiot does this to literally everyone.
ZephyrDrake2 votesI don't get it... when any other champion like Quinn and Graves have high winrate boards instantly cries for nerfs but it's ok for champions like Nami to have that winrate? And boards call Riot biased.
destroyer227191 votesI don't get it... when any other champion like Quinn and Graves have high winrate boards instantly cries for nerfs but it's ok for champions like Nami to have that winrate? And boards call Riot biased.
this is a similar situation for . Difference is her peel isn't brain dead. And plus there are plenty of other supports equal to her viablility
ZephyrDrake1 votesdifference is that people don't want to actually be fair and just want whatever they don't like nerfed and whatever they enjoy kept at their current strength or even buffed. Sorry but if ANY champion cannot have the winrate of Nami then Nami cannot have that winrate. If it's ok for Nami to have such winrate then other champions should be fine and allowed to have the same winrate. It's called being fair, not "depending on whether I like this or not the champion then needs a nerf or a buff" stop being biased for a champion that is currently too strong.
destroyer227191 votesdifference is that people don't want to actually be fair and just want whatever they don't like nerfed and whatever they enjoy kept at their current strength or even buffed. Sorry but if ANY champion cannot have the winrate of Nami then Nami cannot have that winrate. If it's ok for Nami to have such winrate then other champions should be fine and allowed to have the same winrate. It's called being fair, not "depending on whether I like this or not the champion then needs a nerf or a buff" stop being biased for a champion that is currently too strong.
Team fighting compared to other supports as Nami is a laugh compared to stuff like 
ZephyrDrake1 votesTeam fighting compared to other supports as Nami is a laugh compared to stuff like
and? that means something? somehow that makes it ok for her to have such a high winrate? it obviously doesn't matter if her teamfighting isn't as strong as other supports if her winrate is as high as it is. It's still pretty decent so no idea what you are even trying to say. Nami isn't the absolute best at a single thing but she is strong enough in various things that when combined still makes her a pretty strong champion. You can compare her to Sona which is another "jack of all trades master of none" type of champion and when compared to Sona, Nami has a much stronger early game at the cost of a weaker late game when compared to Sona
BestPudgeNA1 votes
Has a much lower pick rate and win rate in solo Q.
ect are all also "nami's Competitors" and she has been dumpstering all of them for like 3 months in terms of win rates
OtterlyLost1 votesThat is the boldest face lie I have ever seen this century. Alistars pick rate is actually higher, yes, higher, than Nami's in soloqueue.
As for Tahm, he does not win against Nami and never has regardless of her perceived strength. He has always been a better team fighter where as Nami is a laning support.
It's interesting, however, that you mention Leona, since yes she is a counter to Nami. She also beats Nami in both pick rate and winrate.
But please, keep falsifying information to support your bullshit agenda.
Mobile Phone2 votesThat is the boldest face lie I have ever seen this century. Alistars pick rate is actually higher, yes, higher, than Nami's in soloqueue.
As for Tahm, he does not win against Nami and never has regardless of her perceived strength. He has always been a better team fighter where as Nami is a laning support.
It's interesting, however, that you mention Leona, since yes she is a counter to Nami. She also beats Nami in both pick rate and winrate.
But please, keep falsifying information to support your bullshit agenda.
? Are you actually trying to use op.gg for winrates? You can literally look at any of the other stat websites and you'll see how trash it is lol.
Alistar has never had a higher winrate than nami this entire season. His pickrate is only higher than her in bronze and silver. Thresh has always been a top pickrate, literally still had a +10% pick rate when at 46% winrate. It has been YEARS since thresh has been 51% winrate or higher and it has taken 3 buffs in a row just to get him there. So idk why pick rate is a topic when thresh has always been top tier for pick rates for years.
Oh, pyke? you mean the champ who has literally never had a 50% winrate or higher before finally just now hitting it?
Lets look at nami now though, and remember, op.gg is the only website that says nami has had a 50-51% winrate. Every single other website i can find (champion.gg, league of graphs, lolalytics) ALL SHOW she has been sitting at a 53-54% winrate the entire season and before that even.
But please, keep using the worst and most innacurate sources to keep looking ignorant as shit.
edit: don't just downvote and have an actual response.
BestPudgeNA1 votesThat is the boldest face lie I have ever seen this century. Alistars pick rate is actually higher, yes, higher, than Nami's in soloqueue.
I use Lolalytics because it covers all regions rather then just KR and is more sortable by elos. Ali has 4% lower pick rate and a 2% lower win rate. Nami has literally been the number win rate champ for like 4 patches and she has been top 3 in terms of pick rate
Also stop stalking me it's getting creepy
haaaaaaalp1 votesBecause all of the competitors needed nerfs as well. I would much rather riot nerf the champions out of line now than buff all of the champions that we know were problems before their nerfs.
D357R0Y3R1 votesand?
this looks like something normal to do this is what you call balance