Please do NOT give us 10 bans.

Surr20plz··4 votes·447 views

6 is enough.

10 Comments

Maximum Morde4 votes

No, I want 10. 1 for each person is best. Makes me feel not left out when I'm 1st/2nd pick :)

Jaygo412 votes

I like the idea of having players' champion pools pinched. It's like people need to branch out and not play Yasuo or Riven every goddamn game. and no, the ENTIRE jungle pool won't get banned, the ENTIRE mid pool won't get banned, etc. There's simply too many champs for that to happen.

Disdain2 votes

[deleted]

Maximum Morde1 votes

Even the ADC and especially the SUP pool is too large to ban out. You might be able to coincidentally ban out an individual players pool of champions for a role, but not all the champions capable of that role itself.

Oleandervine1 votes

6 is not enough. There are 132 - soon to be 133 - champions. Banning only 6 when there are usually more than 6 obnoxious champions is not enough.

Kaioko1 votes

Give us 10 bans after you figure out a way to make matchmaking not take at least 5+ minutes minimum if you don't queue for support.

Surr20plz1 votes

5 bans lets u ban out entire team comps. That's nonsense and unnecessary.

Ulquiorra9952 votes

Then pick something else except current FOTM team comp. This game has around 120 champions, I'm sure you can come up with more than two compositions.

Me, personally, am just glad that Ekko will be as good as deleted from my games once we get those 10 bans.

Surr20plz1 votes

No, it's nonsense.

The fact that you think it's ok to delete so many champs is a good thing is garbage.

More from Gameplay

More by Surr20plz