" Champs with no mana are OP"
I see a lot of people at the lower Elo say this. I always assumed that if a champ had no mana, they must be lacking something in another area to compensate for the advantage on other laners that do work around their mana costs. Are champs with no mana justified? From what I can tell, all the champs with no mana are pretty damn strong. Example: Riven, Zac, Yasuo, Katarina, so on. I guess I don't have muchh of a point but I wish I knew why these champs were granted this advantage. A lot of people have to really work around their mana and can only use abilities for when their laner engages. While other laners get to farm with their abilities
If only that were true.