Sated Devourer on Tyndamere

{quoted}

120 stacks devourer is MUCH MUCH MUCH better than the new devourer on any champion lol. tho the fact that it stacks faster and you are actually DONE some day with stacking is a huge benefit for those champions that synergized super-well with it, but for those champions that only do okay with it like tryndamere and udyr, they actually liked the infinite-stacks to become really absurdly strong.

i think what it did for the semi-benefitted champions like trynd, it pushed their power spike a bit earlier into the game but weakening their lategame. what it did for real benefactors is it increased their maximum power and also gave it to them super early.

this item isnt gonna last long, or some champions aint.

New devourer with 30 stacks : 60 damage on-hit -> Double on-hit : 120 magic damage on-hit Damage of botrk on-hit (since it's doubled, just take the damage from the on-hit and it is the difference between old and new) on a 2000 HP target (midlife tank/full life carry) : 160 physical damage on-hit on a 1000 HP target (low life tank/mid life carrry): 80 physical damage on-hit (+the on-hit from botrk procs lifesteal)

Old devourer with 120 stacks : 145 magic damage on-hit.

Sated devourer compared to 120 stacks old devourer : - 25 magic damage on-hit

• around 100 physical damage on-hit if botrk
• lifesteal added from second botrk on-hit
• double on-hit effects for everything else too

Sated devourer is strictly better than old devourer until 95 stacks, without botrk. I honestly think 120 stacks is approximately equal power-wise, if not still less strong (!)