Help me understand how you could have possibly nerfed singed, while we now have to deal with gnar?

Seriously This is where i really just can't fathom the thought process of the balance team, and you do this all year round every year you nerf irrelevant champs and then add more champs that make them even more irrelevant.

So over the last year or so singed was the target of a number of nerfs why? because he was a tanky initiator melee champ? Then you release gnar who does EVERYTHING singed does but does it ten times better while also having insanely safe laning and mega safe farming harass as well due to his range, slow, and numerous jumps. the net result Singed is an impossibly bad champion who has no hope laning vs almost everything and anything and you refuse to undo all the nerfs given which STILL would leave him in a very subpar place to lane.

Just did the exact same thing recently with Warwick, knee jerk reaction because of a poorly designed jungle item, which you nerf but then you give warwick 4 nerfs a champion who was ALREADY subpar and an low tier jungler. Now here we are warwick is a subpar bad champion.

Please don't give me the self serving story about kit being difficult to balance, when you have champions like lee sin/j4 running around dominating NOW THOSE champs have toxic kits hard to balance.

The list is long urgot? meanwhile trist corki and the crew of ultra safe powerful ADC's lives on forever urgot? herr derr toxic kit (immobile big phat target) but hey corki kit NOT TOXIC! boggle make it make sense.