Surrender vote reduced to 15 minutes?
Since Riot is targeting shorter games, why force people to play for 20 minutes when most games are decided in about 10-15 minutes?
Since Riot is targeting shorter games, why force people to play for 20 minutes when most games are decided in about 10-15 minutes?
At the very least, the time required to FF should be reduced when you have someone who DCs/AFKs/Ragequits.
[{quoted}](name=The Big Piece,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=5Jtg9rrT,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2017-01-18T21:29:56.666+0000)
At the very least, the time required to FF should be reduced when you have someone who DCs/AFKs/Ragequits.
I think that if someone is AFK for more than 10 minutes in a game it should be an automatic loss prevented.
I don't know about that, but if someone AFKs, I should be able to leave the game without a leaverbuster penalty. I'll gladly take the LP lost if I can just get into another game without wasting 35 mins of my life.
Omg this. This this this. Let me take the loss and get on with my life.
Too bad it would hurt the fee fees of the "never surrender argggg!!!" sjw so rito won't implement it. They'll just force us to play in a toxic environment.
God i hate those never surrender people.
Lets waste time playing a game that should have been over at 20 minutes cause we are too far behind, it will be fun!
Chances of the team even winning in that situation is already low cause your teammates proved that they can't even play vs the enemy with even gold and will just make more mistakes to throw any lead you gain if the enemy team throws somehow.
The only time i'm one of those "Never Surrender" people is when I'm playing a late game powerhouse, i'll be damned if i'm playing veigar and have to quit when im only 600 AP
When you're having free farm and 3/0 as Nasus top and see your 1/7 ADC and 0/8 support.
Midlaner : ff at 20
Me : Bruh
I think that if someone is AFK for more than 10 minutes in a game it should be an automatic loss prevented.
Absolutely not. That would lead to boosting exploits like mad.
Don't see it happening in dota..
Don't see it happening in dota..
Then go play dota. It will be exploited in league. Player is getting boosted by a duo boosting account. Boosting account realizes the game is a loss and AFKs Player is loss prevented and continues boosting.
You could implement the same system in Dota into League
Ughhhhh I hate people that use the "WELL GO PLAY ____ THEN" Argument, it's legendarily stupid. Is it that hard to imagine that some games do things better than League Of Legends, or is it a pride thing?
Wouldn't that all be avoided by the specific AFKer (or premade teammates) not getting loss prevented?
Wouldn't that all be avoided by the specific AFKer (or premade teammates) not getting loss prevented?
Valid point that you could make it so duo's can't be loss prevented if the partner is the one to DC. But it still could be exploited.
I, for one, wouldn't mind taking the hit for the team if I know I played horribly and was the cause of the loss.
And the team shouldn't be punished for your feeding anyway lol.
They said they are planning on introducing 15 minute ff in this season, but it will be a very experimental change.
yeah, they said it'd have to be unanimous as well.
Well, I'm voting no so.... Sorry.
What does unanimous mean in that regard? Can someone elaborate pls? ^.^
all 5 players must vote yes for the vote to pass.
I don't understand the hesitation. Leave it there as an option, if people don't want to surrender at 15 minutes, they can click no. But the option to surrender should be there.
Yes then people can give up winnable games earlier!
^
There should remove the surrender option all together. Force people to play smarter and not let bad player ruin more games than necessary...
[{quoted}](name=Kempachi Taichou,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=5Jtg9rrT,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2017-01-18T21:02:40.424+0000)
There should remove the surrender option all together. Force people to play smarter and not let bad player ruin more games than necessary...
Ok then option afk exists which you will get every other game.
Fuck you for not ffing a 3-26 game 1-8 towers. You are the people that ruin the game
Surrender option should be removed and they SHOULD in theory ban all the ppl who afk, troll or int feed
Surrender option should be removed and they SHOULD in theory ban all the ppl who afk, troll or int feed
Thank god they don't listen to people like you or this game would be dying faster then it already is.
[{quoted}](name=Sorakas Tits,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=5Jtg9rrT,comment-id=0001000100010000,timestamp=2017-01-18T22:25:25.461+0000)
Thank god they don't listen to people like you or this game would be dying faster then it already is.
In the spirit of competitiveness, players should always be trying their best to win at all stages of the game, barring negative use of chat towards the enemy team.
In the spirit of competitiveness, players should always be trying their best to win at all stages of the game, barring negative use of chat towards the enemy team.
Win games.... That ARE winnable.
[{quoted}](name=Sorakas Tits,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=5Jtg9rrT,comment-id=000100010001000000000000,timestamp=2017-01-19T02:17:14.522+0000)
Win games.... That ARE winnable.
I said "[i]n the spirit of competitiveness."
90% of those "lost" games are winnable in the trash elo most of us play. But instead you type ff, proceed to go from 0/4 to 0/12 instead of getting gud and play smart
90% of those "lost" games are winnable in the trash elo most of us play. But instead you type ff, proceed to go from 0/4 to 0/12 instead of getting gud and play smart
Lol I could be 0-5 or 5-0 and if my teammates fed and the game is 5-12 I'm saying ff the game is over. Don't pull this "90%" shit out of your ass asshole.
Wait, you are that dude spamming the ff when it's 5-12 at 20 minutes ?
So that means you NEVER lost a game where your team went 12-5 ?
That's what I wanted to say all along
[{quoted}](name=Sorakas Tits,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=5Jtg9rrT,comment-id=00010001,timestamp=2017-01-18T21:20:08.865+0000)
Ok then option afk exists which you will get every other game.
Fuck you for not ffing a 3-26 game 1-8 towers. You are the people that ruin the game
are you not the one that afks and ints creating such a kill deficit? you are the person that runes this game fucko
We can't really play smarter when you get 4 manned bot and taking first blood tower. In addition, the bot lane tower doesn't even have fortification.
We can't really play smarter when you get 4 manned bot and taking first blood tower. In addition, the bot lane tower doesn't even have fortification.
Then why play? if you cannot defend the four man push, then your team failed with warding, pings, and following their roams....
So yeah, play smarter.
I forgot to put in the fact that 4 people can dive 2 under tower. Turrets are weak as hell right now also.
Just saying, turrets could always only hit one person at a time.
Throw the tankiest guy under the tower first and your three buddies have free rein.
When did it not work this way?
Riot (Meddler) stated that they're planning on setting surrender to 15 min.
5 minute FF plz
Why wait? Forfeit during champ select.
"Is that poppy?!" Smashes forfeit button
FF during AFK check PLZ!
I was thinking more like 18min. More often when I think about surrendering I sit there thinking just 2 more min.
A little unrelated to the discussion, but what do you guys think about people not voting at all when your team tries to surrender? I'm not sure if it should be an automatic no or yes.
Should definitely stay automatic no
It would be… incredibly troll for a non-vote to count as yes. Precedent alone would cause anybody who hadn't paid attention to patch notes to be furious when 1 person clicks "surrender", another clicks no, it's a stupid surrender and nobody else pays attention, whoops guess ya lose now el giggle. There's always those games where you're up one tower, two dragons and three kills at 20 minutes but somebody wants to ff@20 anyway just because they, personally, lost lane.
I think an abstain should be an abstain. If you don't vote, you don't care. And let surrender be simple majority. That way feeding troll duos can't hold a game hostage for 40 minutes. So with both abstentions and simple majority, If two people vote yes, one votes no, and two abstain, it should count as a surrender. Ties in this case would not surrender (2 yes, 2 no, 1 abstain for example).