If you wanted to force Cassiopeia into being this machine gun E-bot. Why not make a NEW champion?

Whenever you say you're "reading all the criticisms/feedbacks", I'm not sure if you understand what the people are trying to get across. We tell you that we hate her E, and sometimes it feels like you think we think we mean "her E isn't strong, please make her E even more prominent in her kit!"

Admittedly there's like a hundred points coming at once, but that's because there's so much wrong with her rework that I don't even know how she became what she is when most other reworks weren't half as messy.

I explained in excruciating detail just why you were wrong to make her E such an important aspect of her kit over her Q or W.. But pretend that you think making her into a mano-a-mano AP brawler is befitting of Cassiopeia (just try to rationalize how this fits her image). I'm sure you've noticed that most of the controversy comes from those of us who loved her for her POISON MAGE identity that her Q and W gave her.

The question then is, if you're so dedicated into making her into a champion that has as little to do with Cassiopeia as possible, why didn't you just make a NEW champion to begin with?

---

Maybe it's just me. But it really does look like your rework is starting to create a bigger and bigger divide between two camps of Cassiopeia players who, pre-rework, simply ignored one another's existence. But by **catering solely to one camp **while brushing off the other camp, you essentially turned many Cassiopeia players against one another.

There's the camp that liked a Cassiopeia with a playstyle that fits her niche as a Poison spreading mage. An AoE DoT caster. Then there's the camp who likes this mano-a-mano all-in AP brawler. The camp who all along just wanted this.

The rework caters solely to the latter while the former..