Boards›Gameplay

Anyone feel like these 'Tier lists' are extremely biased?

Fate Decides·8/21/2019, 3:37:22 PM·1 votes·777 views

Seems like they control the playerbase and promote meta-slave mindsets.

No one seems to have a quirky main anymore or a strange build or tactic that they enjoy. They all pick the same champions.

You get HARASSED hard if you pick something off-meta nowadays you better carry and win the game for them, if you don't you're the worst player in the world and you're trolling.

Another I feel like is that they actually don't cater for lower elos or the average playerbase, they have 'Challenger Analysts' who say pick this champion to insta-win all your games then some unsuspecting casual player picks it up thinking he's going to dominate and he just doesnt and ends up raging at everyone.

Pyke Darius Ezreal Kai'sa Sivir Vladimir Ahri Yasuo Karthus

If you don't see one of these champions in your game you're not playing league of legends.

Why doesn't anyone have mains anymore :c

1 Comments

CrazyMonkeyCZ8/21/2019, 3:50:29 PM1 votes

You get HARASSED hard if you pick something off-meta nowadays

I have been Rumble mid main for almost 8 years, with pauses, but still, after watching RumbleMidGG, I started playing him mid as well. So I have to tell you, no, it isn't just nowadays, it was always this way. Playing something that isn't in meta always made you target if you were losing.

If you are looking for tierlists for lower elos, I personally like this one or this one and since I'm MidBeast viewer, his are imo reliable as well. But there are countles of good ones, but also bad ones, like ones created by websites, that looks at win rates and will give you Ez/Kaisa like D tier(u.gg)