Thoughts on matchmaking

z63XnLCMwX··3 votes·3,506 views

I was never a fan of dividing bronze into iron and bronze and adding a grandmaster tier. It's redundant when matchmaking still pairs you up with people significantly below and above your current rank in order to shorten queue time. Currently having more ranks is nothing but a superficial way of putting a new paint job on a shitty infrastructure. Dividing ranks would only be useful if you are only made to play with people inside said rank.

The current system matches people by mmr, but the same mmr can appear as different ranks, which is why a plat 2 player can still have a diamond 4 and a gold 1 player in their games. Now assume the Gold 1 has a MMR of Plat 4 and the Diamond has a MMR of Plat 1, and everyone else has their correct MMR for their rank. A team such as: TEAM 1: Diamond 4, Plat 3, Plat 3, Plat 3, Plat 2 TEAM 2: Plat 2, Plat 2, Plat 2, Gold 1, Plat 2 could potentially be made with the team MMR on both side being close to identical, but the Max-Mix difference in each side would be huge. The Diamond 4 can easily exploit the Gold 1 player causing a huge favor to them despite both team having "similar" mmr.

The only way to fix this is to accept the increase in queue time and having everybody play against people in their same rank while still using the current MMR system to form teams. That way, the diamond 4 player would only be matched with other diamond 4 players within their MMR and the gold 1 only against people in gold close to their MMR.

6 Comments

Jaguar Påw1 votes

Ranks mean nothing, SECRET MMR that is never disclosed determines who is in what game. What could possibly go wrong ??? :D They have it this way so it is more of a grind, for everyone, high rank, smurf, or low rank. Frankly they just use the queue time excuse to validate poor matchmaking.. and it got old a few seasons ago.

Darkdemon6531 votes

MMR is more indicative of skill level than rank is. As things are now, there's no reason to have rank influence matchmaking.

z63XnLCMwX1 votes

{quoted}

MMR is more indicative of skill level than rank is. As things are now, there's no reason to have rank influence matchmaking.

Then end of season rewards should be based off MMR instead of rank, but it is not. I'm sure there's quite a bit of people end of season with higher than rank MMR who missed the rewards and people with lower than rank MMR that got the rewards. Skill can only take you so far in a team based game. Even Faker can't even carry his team to victory.

Darkdemon6531 votes

{quoted}

Then end of season rewards should be based off MMR instead of rank, but it is not. I'm sure there's quite a bit of people end of season with higher than rank MMR who missed the rewards and people with lower than rank MMR that got the rewards. Skill can only take you so far in a team based game. Even Faker can't even carry his team to victory.

There are more who have gold ranks with silver MMR than have silver ranks with gold MMR. Skill (I prefer "performance") will take one as far as one deserves to go (ignoring premades).

z63XnLCMwX1 votes

{quoted}

There are more who have gold ranks with silver MMR than have silver ranks with gold MMR. Skill (I prefer "performance") will take one as far as one deserves to go (ignoring premades).

That is true assuming you're willing to grind out hundreds on game to get where you belong. It could be faster if matchmaking was more optimized.

More from Gameplay

More by z63XnLCMwX