Anyone else agree?

They did this last year.

They had two alternate streams going. 1 for a PLAYER on each side. So you just saw what that player saw I think.

It sounds super interesting, but i never watched it. And it isn't back.... so.

I think it would. But I doubt the teams would want their team chat broadcast.

Calls that look so easy to some because they see the whole board wouldn't seem so easy when they look at the team's board that made the call. They sometimes show one team's board or the others. But not enough. I think it would be a ton better during replays if they showed one team's board or the others while the analysts are going over it much more than they do.

I think a lot of Why didn't they go in on that, would be answered if we saw what the team's board looked like. Oh that entire area was dark. No wonder they didn't want to go in.

I wouldn't like the idea of it because the crowd's reaction is already giving so much information to the other team. Whenever a team tries a baron steal or some sneaky moves, the crowd would just get so hyped that their voice would get through the mic and makes everyone in the other team wonder what is going on. If you listened to the team mic released from riot, you can always hear that cheering from crowd when the team is making some great plays. This is simply unfair to the other team.

The headphone is not enough. You can still hear if the voice is loud enough. Go watch the mic check released by riot. You can hear the crowd cheer when teams make great plays. And it is just NALCS. Now they are in world where there are much much more people sitting down there. No one can speak for sure that crowds won't cheer when they see someone try to make some sneaky engage. Slight delay? Won't matter if you wait in a bush a few seconds.

I want to hear coach KKomas conversation with Blank while watching their games.