What are things casters say that you entirely disagree with?
^title
^title
Cloud drake is useful
Cloud drake needs some more love, it's actually not a bad buff if you know where and when to rotate around the map. Also as far as i know if you got a decent lead it can helps assassin's get to their target faster :3
in the lcs -It's never noticeable and very rarely can a caster say, "It's a good thing they got that cloud drake!"... You hear about the Ocean drake's sustain, the Infernal drake's damage, and the ability to tear down Baron/Towers with the mountain drake, and then we have the Cloud drake... just there... you know... not really doing anything noticeably helpful for a team.
When they say "He lands the Q" instead of the actual name of the spell/ability.
Basically everything riv says cause it hurts how little he actually sees/knows what is going on
That's the way it was for me every time Deman and Joe Miller opened their mouths.
What's worse was that as much as I legitimately love British accents, Deman sounds like he's in a constant state of chewing gum, and Joe sounds like he's literally choking on dicks.
When the EU casters try to poke fun at krepo for being bad at the game, despite the fact that he has the highest-ranked account among all of them (and even higher than a bunch of current/actual LCS players).
Phreak ADC game balance.
When casters call everything a tank, instead of a juggernaut or other terms. Half the reason people on the boards do not know what a true tank is cause of that shit.
When a caster says a specific mechanic is "difficult" or "Impressive".
Usually the reason a pro player DOESN'T execute a specific "difficult" play is because of the risk, and not because it's actually hard for them to perform it. There are some exceptions but it's irritating when I see a caster or analyst assume a player is mechanically skilled or not because they've seen them do a certain play once or twice a game.