So, that (formerly CLG) Link statement . . .

iLuma·5/14/2015, 10:20:36 PM·3 votes·1,415 views

Thoughts?

12 Comments

Nidalee SO NYAAA5/14/2015, 10:31:53 PM2 votes

I think Link needs to check himself. That one TSM game they played in they lost because he kept messing up Lissandra ult on team fights. His team did not play well but ether did he.

SinatraZ5/15/2015, 2:21:24 PM1 votes

Im kinda surprised at what he said from every players in CLG. I always knew Doublelift was a bad teammate though. Also, Montecristo was a very bad coach it seems like.

PoisonedTea5/15/2015, 5:49:16 PM1 votes

I think it is a bad thing on the whole, and very disrespectful. Almost putting that he was prefect where everyone else was not.

BUT I think the post in itself had some good points on showing CLG issues. Many beyond his control.

I don't think Link comparing so is anything like the leader he is claiming to do. Also Link tried to put himself as one of the best mid laners in NA, Link is not putting presence on the map like Bjergsen or Hai. Even if he was a top 3 mid in NA it was not comparable to these players, but comparable to player worst then them.

someone0101015/16/2015, 6:21:45 PM1 votes

_It was the wrong way to play the game. League is a team game. You don’t just sacrifice your lane and pray they’ll do fine. It’s not how you win the game. Every lane is just an extension of the game. Every lane is just a piece of the team. _

But, TSMs been winning for a while now ...

DestructoDave5/20/2015, 8:26:14 PM1 votes

There is always some truth. Obviously, Link is being biased with his own view of himself. If anything, we can guess Link was a slacker. He seemed like a slacker, even his big post comes off as a slacker. The type of guy who didn't put any effort in.

I can imagine half of what he says about Dlift and his team is correct. These are general feelings you get just from looking in from the outside. Its not like its a stretch to believe any of it. We see most of it anyways.

As far as Monte goes, well I never believed he would be a good coach anyways. You cant just decide to be a leader or a coach. He doesnt seem like a coach, he does good analysis and shoutcasting, but thats it. He might be a good analyst to help a team, but he doesnt seem like the kind of guy who could garner any respect and/or be a good coach. I mean, the fact he tried doing Skype coaching should say just now effective he really was. You cannot coach like that; hell you cannot even lead like that. I think we all knew that wasnt going to work out when we heard it. Sounded more like a publicity stunt, or a typical CLG screwup where they stick someone who is not qualified in a position they were not qualified for. Sticking ADC mains in top lane, sticking mid laners in the jungle, sticking shoutcasters in coaching positions. Etc.