NA vs EU the Age old debate.

RendDuzit·3/9/2016, 11:39:30 PM·1 votes·424 views

I sat here for days after SKT won IEM thinking why everyone gives TSM/NA shit when they lose 2-0 to SKT but no one says much when Fnatic loses 3-0 and surrenders.. I sat here wondering why.. And it hit me awhile ago..

The reason we fight is because no one expects anything from EU they know they will fail in the end. But, NA is the big dog and everyone such high expectations and when let down it leads to flamers. When EU let's EU down they just are like "Yeah, we expected as much".

Did Fnatic hire some new French people for their team?

3 Comments

FrankerX3/9/2016, 11:44:28 PM3 votes

hm tbh i dont see much ppl blame tsm. usually they joke about the region that lost the last match (for whatever reason. in this case its eu)

also i think you got something wrong... as phreak said at worlds... "in the end we all chear for eu because they usually make it further than na does". which is also the case in season 1 2 3 and 5.

not that i really give a fuck about that region war because in the end its korea>>>>>>>all but still, besides season 4 eu always was better than na.

the main reason why i think na is mad is because lets be real you pay 3 times as much for your players than eu does and still in most tournaments you dont make it out of groups. you buy all the eu and kr players and are stuck in groups.

YCitizenSnipsY3/10/2016, 12:58:10 AM1 votes

Most people don't say anything when EU loses because they are either making excuses or already knew EU is trash compared to KR.

No one expects anything from either region, NA is just worse so they get more shit.

TurquoiseYoshi3/10/2016, 1:34:12 AM1 votes

Or because TSM is the much bigger target. They're the largest organization in all of esports, people chant their name in a completely different region just for lolz, so when they fail, it's like the Lakers or the Cowboys, they get swamped with criticism.