Question, re: Worlds format
I admit I'm disappointed with NA performance, but frankly TSM and IMT didn't deserve to go through with how those games went. That out of the way, I gotta ask: Why the HELL are World formatted this way?!?
To be more precise, why isn't worlds setup so (for example) all the #1 seeds from each region (and maybe 1 "wild card" team if you want to get the non-majors in) have an automatic seed in the Knock-out stage. And then everyone else uses Groups as a "play-in"? If you keep 8 in the knock-outs, then you have 5 or 6 "set" teams and 2-3 variable depending on how things go. Even if you want to argue that that just means you have 5 teams + 3 Korean teams, that's EXACTLY what we have now. At least if you seed the #1s through automatically you have each region represented in the knockout stage.
I mean, honestly I don't see why they don't just do it like "March Madness" and bracket everyone all the way down, but if we're assuming that'd take too long, at least if they gave the #1s a "bye" you could have a solid tourney from knockouts on, rather than most people checking out after groups.