i saw another post where everyone agreed that they trolled with really bad performance after game 2, but im not good at anylising so i cant make the difference between a bad c9 or a good tsm.
can someone explain to me why its c9 being bad and not tsm playing well that ended the game.
(only thing i noticed by myself was the 2 zeyzal engage that did nothing good and killed him)
[sg-lux-2]
If playing forward with map advantage only to be unexpectedly flanked by the evident damage threat is considered bad, then clap clap, keep being an armchair analyst. We all watched how close that Game 3 was to ending until that one point. The rest of the series plays out and TSM plays the better game and the more comfortable comp.
To me, C9 didn't play bad. At game 5, I just wrapped it up to it was the best they could do with what they had and gave; it's no point playing what ifs that late in a series and especially with a draft well known as that. Overall, It's just fans being fans or haters being haters.
I think the problem lies with Repeared. If my understanding is correct, Repeared is the one who influences the draft. They continuously picked J4 Jungle, even though TSM EASILY worked around him. And the Zed mid was just a tragic choice.
TSM were down 2-0. Reggie called Marc Merrill and accepted his offer for the Riot buff. Paid him directly with his paypal account. Wins secured. Doubt Reggie is richer than Steve though. Enjoy the final!
