...if lore and gameplay and separate, eh? Don't you think you're being a little hypocritical now, especially when that was your excuse to wipe the whole lore to begin with?!
Disabling him for story-based reasons only made sense when the Institute was unable to find a Champion safely.
He's disabled because of in game bugs, Riot is just having a little fun.
Try getting the stick out of your ass.
He's disabled because of in game bugs, Riot is just having a little fun.
Try getting the stick out of your ass.
it's a joke it's not anything to do with the lore (well technically) but they're only disabling because it's funny since disabling is like he's REALLY dead in-game.
I get all that, but it's still in really poor taste. Not that funny.
If they didn't seperate lore and gameplay,then they would have needed to remove him entirely,not just disable him for a short time.
it's a joke it's not anything to do with the lore (well technically) but they're only disabling because it's funny since disabling is like he's REALLY dead in-game.
Op is the reason why i tend to hate this section, you people bitch and bitch and bitch about "not haveing enough lore" then when its given to you in a very straight up way you bitch about it.
Not all of you but people like OP give you a horrid name.
Hey, I'd say to get the stick out of your ass, but evidently it's a full pole.
Why are you even complaining about this?
They never separated anything. Game and lore have always been together, or else we'd not see have the videos they've made for all the recent events and champions.
