@Riot: consider renaming "Intentionally feeding" to something more generic.

DeathBurst·1/26/2016, 5:57:50 PM·4 votes·984 views

One of the old labels was, if I remember correctly, "assisting the enemy team". It's far more generic and better suited than "Intentionally feeding".

What should I do about people saying "open mid" and not dying, but not trying to win? What should I do about people saying in /all chat "they are doing baron now, you're welcome". Currently, I just check "Intentionally feeding" then explain in the text area what actually happened, but it's clunky.

Also, even if the word "intentional" was prominently added, people still tend to report you just if you lose your lane, because you're "feeding". I do believe that "assisting the enemy team" would remove part of this nonsense.

Thank you :)

5 Comments

DeathBurst1/28/2016, 1:35:21 PM2 votes

Bump?

Zielmann1/26/2016, 6:05:29 PM1 votes

I feel like they fit under Negative Attitude, with the new categories. They're all basically signs of giving up on winning the game, without going all the way to intentional feeding.

I would agree, though, that Assisting Enemy Team would make more sense for those situations.

Mitchell11111/26/2016, 7:18:49 PM1 votes

you should only report "open mid" if only one person does it I think of "open mid" kinda like a per 20 surrender if 3 or more people want to open mid you should probably just open mid and move on no need to report. However that said if someone dies once in lane 3 min in and says open mid then afks farms bot all game then report him

DeathBurst1/26/2016, 7:22:08 PM1 votes

Could the people downvoting at least explain why? I don't think this is a really polemic thread, so if I'm missing something I'd like to know what...