What's worse, losing a game you know it's lost but teammates refuse to surrender, or losing a game knowing there was a possibility to win but there's a teammate who refuses to cooperate on the objective? I'd say it's obviously the latter.
Losing is bad no matter the reason or circumstances. If I played this game for fun, I wouldn't play.
I can always carry myself to a win, so definitely the former. I routinely play 1v9, doing what I see fit and taking the victory. If I out cs the other player, I'll win out.
In a game where the team won't surrender, I'm basically e-jailed and that alone will ensure I do bad and have a horrible experience.
Also, why would you hate people who are trying to win?
Some games can't be won or the effort it would take requires extreme effort and unusual luck and it's just not worth it. I always play on limited time, so the shorter the better. I'd rather lose a game in 20 than maybe win in 60 after extreme luck.
Is it bad to not surrender?
I don't find games where I get raped like above to be fun and it took us over 40 minutes to get close to a point where we could slip a win out.
The answer is like they would say in every sport, no. The best answer in sports will always be "never surrender until the very end".
Most sports don't have AFK's, permanent 5v4's or strange systems where you win and get 10 points but lose and lose 20 points. Don't recall seeing an NBA game where the player had to AFK due to his mom yelling at him about chores or a game where the Quaterback goes to watch youtube during the play.