Why is it that if one person decides they don't want to play they're allowed to ruin it for 4 others

Finn Teh Human·1/19/2018, 1:11:46 AM·1 votes·303 views

In my series, jungler goes Ezreal, dies twice, and then decides he doesn't want to play the game and goes AFK. I would take a toxic person who plays the fucking game over someone who AFK's any day. AFKers ruin games more than toxic people because I'd rather just mute someone who I know is a dumbass then have to sit for 15 minutes because someone decided to AFK.

4 Comments

420 grams1/19/2018, 3:01:35 AM3 votes

Unfortunately their handcuff everybody to their computer policy never made it past beta

Jo0o1/19/2018, 1:15:14 AM2 votes

There are punishments in place to dissuade such behavior. They're tricky to enforce, since it's difficult to differentiate a rage-quit from, say, a power outage. But folks do get punished for doing this.

Telephone Booth1/19/2018, 4:09:23 AM1 votes

It is not allowed. And I agree; having a 4v5 is definitely not preferred over having a 5v5 with one teammate muted. Hope you reported. I just replied to a thread from a guy who got LPQ due to disconnects and he was not happy, to say the least. It is punished. I don't know why you would think that it is allowed... That'd be pretty silly.

Ph03n1xb1rd1/19/2018, 2:06:18 PM1 votes

Because Rito only cares about not hurting the snowflakes and not about actual gameplay / game experience.

If you dont flame you are allowed to do WHATEVER you want in this game, get used to it or look for a better game :)

Ps.: I can recommend Dota2