Why is it that if one person decides they don't want to play they're allowed to ruin it for 4 others

Finn Teh Human··1 votes·303 views

In my series, jungler goes Ezreal, dies twice, and then decides he doesn't want to play the game and goes AFK. I would take a toxic person who plays the fucking game over someone who AFK's any day. AFKers ruin games more than toxic people because I'd rather just mute someone who I know is a dumbass then have to sit for 15 minutes because someone decided to AFK.

4 Comments

420 grams3 votes

Unfortunately their handcuff everybody to their computer policy never made it past beta

Jo0o2 votes

There are punishments in place to dissuade such behavior. They're tricky to enforce, since it's difficult to differentiate a rage-quit from, say, a power outage. But folks do get punished for doing this.

Telephone Booth1 votes

It is not allowed. And I agree; having a 4v5 is definitely not preferred over having a 5v5 with one teammate muted. Hope you reported. I just replied to a thread from a guy who got LPQ due to disconnects and he was not happy, to say the least. It is punished. I don't know why you would think that it is allowed... That'd be pretty silly.

Ph03n1xb1rd1 votes

Because Rito only cares about not hurting the snowflakes and not about actual gameplay / game experience.

If you dont flame you are allowed to do WHATEVER you want in this game, get used to it or look for a better game :)

Ps.: I can recommend Dota2

More from Player Behavior

More by Finn Teh Human