Was flamed by an extremely angry guy post game

fluxanna·Jul 26, 2016·1 votes·874 views

So some time ago a guy made extremely inflammatory remarks that I feel deserve a report.

I know there is an in-game report feature which I used, however I believe there's a way to make a direct report. I looked around and people tell me there's a riot ticket submission I can use, but that just directs me to the boards outright.

Any help please?

Thanks.

Edit: How does thumbs down make sense? Unless this offends you somehow I don't understand what intelligent purpose thumbs down would serve. Other than forcing me to remake the thread because it's fallen behind with insufficient answers.

8 Comments

ModMod CuratorJul 26, 20162 votes

tl:dr - You already reported them. No need to do it twice.

If you reported them in-game, that is the BEST way to report them. Putting them into the automated tribunal system helps better track problem players and remove them from the system. It's only when you can't report them in the client for some reason that you would then look to submit a separate report via a Player Support ticket.

fluxannaJul 28, 20161 votes

That's understandable, however why have I seen threads before which directed players to do this via a player support ticket? And furthermore, the support ticket directs me to the forums for player moderation in the first place.

And suppose... On top of my previous question- I get a message from an unspecified person whom adds me, and I'm unfamiliar with him. He gives me an ad to a boosting website, encouraging me to use it, then removes me. This is smart because I'm unable to report him at all now.

ModMod CuratorJul 28, 20161 votes

[{quoted}](name=Bulbonic plague,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=s6xN11X0,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2016-07-28T04:40:13.808+0000)

That's understandable, however why have I seen threads before which directed players to do this via a player support ticket? And furthermore, the support ticket directs me to the forums for player moderation in the first place.

And suppose... On top of my previous question- I get a message from an unspecified person whom adds me, and I'm unfamiliar with him. He gives me an ad to a boosting website, encouraging me to use it, then removes me. This is smart because I'm unable to report him at all now.

In cases where the person didn't report them in game for whatever reason, we'll direct them to put in a support ticket. If people name & shame on the Boards, the messaging we send directs them there as well because it's assumed if they're trying to report them on the Boards, they chose not to in-game or weren't able to. Some will recommend to people to do it anyway, even if they reported in-game. However, that's fairly pointless as it only takes reporting them once to have that game reviewed and just contributes to Player Support being backlogged with tickets thus delaying their ability to respond to players.

If you add someone you don't know, my question is "Why did you add them?" You're opting in to a conversation at that point with no idea what that person is going to say to you. They do this because they know people will add them. At that point, it's too late to heed the advice of "Don't add people you don't know" so your only resort is to screenshot the message and send in a ticket to Player Support. You'll get a copy/paste reply and they'll look into it and ban the account, but they won't ever tell you that. It's the same thing we do here on the Boards.

fluxannaJul 29, 20161 votes

Thank you. However are you saying the report system takes up a case even with one report?

Thanks for corresponding so far- Said person also openly explained that he was capable of his attitude post-game because post-game chat was not logged in the system at all. Which was exactly where he decided to shine up.

My case is simply that there was extremely larcenous attitude, if reviewed and seen, would decidedly be reported. Just for instance- If this man threw out: Racial, religious, ethnic slurs, excessive cursing, death threats, etc etc, then my predicament would be that nothing has been processed.

Let's just take for instance, that this WAS done and said by the person- then assuredly there's very little question, I suppose? (Unless it is true that post-game chat isn't tribunable'able. My intent is just to fill in the gaps for what hasn't been done, because I'm informed whenever one of my reports are acted on.

If you add someone you don't know, my question is "Why did you add them?" Um, technically I did not add them. They added me. Sorry if my wording was confusing. I logged on and a friend request was waiting for me. I was unsure if I should decline it, but I didn't remember the name. I accepted this request because I was enthusiastic that perhaps I just forgot someone's name I played with the night before, and it simply turns out to be an ad bot. I wasn't concerned about this myself at all- I just had in question if riot would have wanted anything to be done because otherwise, there is no report I have to carry out.

But I'm not sure I understand if you understand me- "Don't add people you don't know" Doesn't seem like very good advice- if someone adds me post game, I would technically not know them at all. And also, for instance, in my example, I don't suppose that I was doing wrong by accepting a request. I wasn't personally troubled by this issue. However I had imagined that you would find it significant because this is a loophole exploit for the ad bot.

ArroweJul 26, 20161 votes

Leave the lobby

fluxannaJul 28, 20161 votes

I did, eventually.

THE UNlCORNJul 28, 20161 votes

you are being a baby. hence the thumbsdown

fluxannaJul 29, 20161 votes

In what way? Checking to what extent the League tribunal system allows me to go, and doing my best to report toxic players is being a baby? And thumbs down is useful in what way? In my OP I'm just suggesting that a thumbs down is actually a useless thing to do for a post like this, and that I'm more concerned that people think it's useful in any way.

I was under the impression that league was against flaming. Was I wrong?