Full recording between NB3 and nubrac League of Legends

{quoted}

At ~27 min Nubrac claims that he was not breaking any rules. Wookieecookie didn't say it was okay. You can't ignore all the stuff after the "However" in the Wookieecookie post.

I have not done that as I have not read what wookiecookie posted. But again: Nowhere did anyone make the claim that nubrac is innocent. I personally think he is correct in this video that I posted.

Nor did I make the claim that Im fully aware of anything.

If you cant find what you looking for at 27 min, try 25 min. Im listening to it right now and its in that area where he talks about it being totally fine, its okey by the rules and they he have been investigated for a long time and so far he had not broken the rules NB3 claims he broke.

The "refusing to communicate" argument NB3 puts out is also rather strange... Read my name, I dont communicate with my team and when I do I get banned for it <-

{quoted}

At ~27 min Nubrac claims that he was not breaking any rules. Wookieecookie didn't say it was okay. You can't ignore all the stuff after the "However" in the Wookieecookie post.

Not breaking the rules means it is okey btw. <- Just like in real life.

{quoted}

Making a new reply to this since you've decided to backpedal in the thread:

I guess you ARE making the claim that nubrac is innocent.

What the hell was the point of claiming that you weren't making the claim?

No Im not, you also dont have to guess, Im right here and can answer. You came in here and started to argue against claims that noone made <- this is what I believe happen. I did try to tell you about it "who made this claim?" "Noone made this claim, where did it come from?"

I hope you understand my explanation, if not let me know and I try again.

{quoted}

The reality of the situation is that riots own data shows that the majority of the teemo roaming games where in games with high profile streamers. The reason that trend would exist would be to incite a reaction which he got. Just not in the way he wanted or maybe it was who knows.

Where can I read about this?

But at the same time it somewhat does make sense. If he is a high-elo player then he will play with and against other high elo players. Some/most(?) of these high elo players are also streamers, ranging from Tyler1 to Nubrac... Inbetween there it must be like what, 5000 LOL streamers?

When you say "high profile streamers" how many viewers do they need to have?

If what you are saying is true.. then he failed at grabbing attetnion the first 100 games and this 100th one he got the mighty NB3 in his game and all of a sudden he went from his 5 regulars to 300 viewers <- In 1 game after 100 attempts... Sorry these are not the patterns of someone wanting attention.

but he has been doing this strat for years and 400 games with streamers, also at that elo you get a streamer in your game almost every second or third game

im not really sure what you are talking about, this whole comment seems really weird to me. for the first point u make, the reason he got more viewers from nb stream is because nb made such a big deal about it, verbally abused him and then afked which is why this blew up so hard because of what nb did not nubrac and he gained viewers from the nb haters, in the past so many other streamers came out and said their hate for him like chase and IWD but he didnt gain insane viewership.

im not sure what you meant by the type of person i am or not, i am the type of person to only speak what you mean and anyone can speak about anything if they want to its up to the reader to decide whether they believe it or not.

Riot already does do this witch hunt with these kind of players so its nothing no and im not sure what you mean because in the example you made its already a thing in real life and as long as you dont do the crime u think about then it deosnt matter how many people threaten u, like with nubrac who didnt do anything against the summoners code or tos but the people who dont like the strat attack him regardless. The problem is when the authority's ignore their own rules to please the people

{quoted}

Rule 1, rule 4,and rule 5 actually a lot of the rules required you to talk I love that people just ignore them. Like I said your not supposed to play off meta if you don't explain it since you're being unsupportive to your team and for the reasons nightblue gave.

People expect champions to be normal meaning there is really no reason to tell your team but picking off meta changes that.

Where can I read about this cause if I just google "Rule 1, rule 4,and rule 5" I dont get where I think you want me to go in order to get information about this.

I believe Nubrac gave a very good counter-argument to that. What is meta? <- Its forever changing, what was meta before may not be meta today.

I dont understand why I should be forced to explain myself just cause I want to build AP shen or AP Naut... Especially in my region where not everyone speaks English, I believe not even 50% of the people on EUW speaks English. <- So what's the point in me explaining something?

Also, I have previously been banned cause I "argue with people in game" <- ... This suggest that I should not talk about what I intend to do cause it can cause arguments. Its better just to play and do what I intend to do and make it happen. Whatever happens happens and it is what it is.

lol i get asked to not pick shaco jg almost every game and as a otp should i just listen to them and not pick it and lose the game, or do i pick shaco and risk getting banned for not communicating or obeying as that would be the better term for what you are suggesting.