Why isn't smurfing a bannable offence?
You know most smurfs are boosting, right? Either directly boosting the account they're playing on, or they're down there to carry someone else who can't win on their own. Hell, in my last game, the enemy top lane boasted proudly that he was being paid money to win games on the account he was playing and he didn't even care if it got banned because he had 10 more.
Hell, even smurfs who aren't boosting for someone else are doing something horribly unsportsmanlike and unfair to the other players in the game. I can't tell you how many games I've had where my team has been clearly the better team than our opponents, only to get beaten anyway practically single-handedly by the enemy top laner (and it's ALWAYS the top laner) who completely murders our poor, outmatched toplaner and feasts on anyone else who tries to help. They're deliberately playing down to a level that it isn't fair for them to be at, and I don't get why Riot's response is to shrug and say "can't be helped".
Smurfs ruins games, OK? They're not SUPPOSED to be in bronze or silver games, that's why you aren't even allowed to duo with someone more than 1 division lower or higher than you, so why is it accepted as long as they put on a paper-thin disguise? "Oh, they're a diamond-level player, but they're playing on a bronze-level account, so they're technically not doing anything wrong". Why is this deemed acceptable and why are these overskilled jerks allowed to continue ruining games for lower-level players who are trying their best and should be able to win if it weren't for the solitary monster who's there exclusively to ruin their shit? Why?
cough.