Do supports need a Sight Stone for an S+
No, no they do not, pic for proof, because otherwise "it didn't happen".
No, no they do not, pic for proof, because otherwise "it didn't happen".
you got lucky that Leona built literally 0 armor or mr other than merc treads.
sightstone is mandatory on all supports, quit trying to pollute the low elos into thinking they don't need it.
also instead of bragging about your "grade" improve your support winrates.
Just as long as you upgraded your trinket.
+
is still the best support setup. It gives them the immense vision control that a team needs, but doesn't want their main carries to buy for.
Where are the Riven mains to downvote this thread?
Let me buffer your votes with an upvote before sheep ambush you ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Archon, as one of the aforementioned low elo players. Could you please explain to me how Sightstone is absolutely mandatory on all supports? I could very easily be missing something but short of the extra 150 or 400 health, does sightstone have anything over the upgraded trinket?
I mean since the wards are the same, the Trinket is cheaper and the fact it isn't exactly hard to get that Health and then some with the freed up item slot...I'm not seeing the point in said Sightstone after you can upgrade the Trinket. So could you please enlighten me so I don't fall into what I can now only guess to be a noob trap?
Well, just shows you that the metric isn´t all that accurate. You can win games with inferior vision if you
a) snowball very hard and just group and go (in which case you can afford the vision anyway and it´s just stupid not to) b) your opponents have no clue how to play around vision themselves
otherwise you´re just a support that is not doing his job.