As far as players go, what do you guys consider to be "new"?

Mellori·1/21/2015, 5:02:36 AM·1 votes·527 views

I've been playing League since last September. I wouldn't consider myself "new", I've learned much of the basics and a good deal of the more advanced strategies. I won't say I'm the best, nor do I consider myself Diamond level.

But it got me thinking, after seeing someone who after playing for over three years, still considered themselves "new". So, that's why I'm asking you guys:

What do you consider to be "new"?

Me personally: If they're under level 30, I consider them to be "new". If they're over level 30, but still are struggling, I'd call that more of a novice or "in-training" if you will, but not new. Anything past that is the various stages of "pro", "advanced", "skilled", so on and so forth.

5 Comments

Aurelius Maximus1/21/2015, 5:14:28 AM3 votes

not level 30 or unranked is new to me

unless you just don't play ranked and have 1000 wins

Flay1/21/2015, 5:20:42 AM3 votes

Under level 30 is new to me.

disregardable1/21/2015, 5:30:49 AM2 votes

I'd say anyone that's been playing the game consistently for less than a year or inconsistently is new. I'd consider players that were here for at least half of season 2 well veteraned players. Inconsistent players will vary. Some knew the meta, fell off, then came back to a new meta. Some didn't know the meta at first but then picked it up in season 4. Some still don't know the meta at all.