It was more like this:
1_._ I'm surprised the thread wasn't outright removed. 2_._ Nobody was seriously discussing politics there.
People ended up seriously discussing politics hence them disabling commenting.
Now you can't even mock feminism lol
I think it was blocked because this is a League of Legends board and they didn't want a political flamewar.
I don't think anyone was getting heated up tho. Also there was barely any political talk xP
...Really? After scrolling for about half a second, all I was seeing were passive aggressive political posts.
That's all I saw, too. After about the 5th political comment in a row I decided it was best if I didn't attempt to stoke that fire and I left, appreciating Laughing Fish's joke without caring what anyone else wanted to say.
at least not in M&Gs? I see a tonne of that junk in the general discussion board >_>
What's the difference between a baby and a feminist?
At some point in it's life, a baby will grow up and stop crying.
What's the difference between a troll on the Internet and a loud, obnoxious bird?
At some point in its life, the bird flies off and stops being a pain in the ass.
The joke's on you. Chickens can't fly.
Is this a roasting battle?
mmm roasted chicken...
also.
pshhh yasuo mains.
Doing my best, but it seems people don't like me after that feminism joke.
I guess I need misogyny because my laughter finds feminism jokes funny.
http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/231/999/ba5.jpg
It's probably because you still felt the need to bring politics into a post LITERALLY making fun of people of people who needlessly bring politics into posts.
That or I dunno, you only got 1 downovte
It's probably because you still felt the need to bring politics into a post LITERALLY making fun of people of people who needlessly bring politics into posts.
Um...
What's the difference between a baby and a feminist?
At some point in it's life, a baby will grow up and stop crying.
What?
That or I dunno, you only got 1 downovte
Actually every post starts with 1 upvote, so that's at least 2 downvotes. 3 on the chicken one.
I don't really feel like I need to explain what I mean.
People making fun of people who bring politics and etc. into posts for no reason. You felt the need to bring up feminism for no reason. Activism etc is all relating back to politics in the end.
Also it's just 2 or 3 downvotes or whatevers, probs just salty people, don't read too much into it. I don't think anyone hates you.
Our very lives are linked to politics "in the end".
Plus I didn't bring up anything. It was a joke response to somebody who did.
Chickens can fly city boy.
Yes, and they also scream "To infinity and beyond!" before doing so.
Well, I suppose "angrily flapping wings to not fall beak first in dirt after a jump" could fit the definition of "flying" in English.
lol, farmers pinion chicken's wings on farms
They can jump over a fence, I won't deny that.
They can achieve lift. Maybe not free-flying, but lift is still relevant in terms of flight. Ask the Wright Brothers.
Airplanes can't achieve flight because they have to land to refuel kappa
Hahaha >.<
[slayer-pantheon-thumbs]
The difference is that you are attacking a person rather than an ideology
I get that this is a League of Legends boards, but politics go greatly in understanding a person's balance philosophy
Leftist- Balance that focuses on making so it is equally satisfying to play every champion Rightist- Balance that focuses on pure mathematics, disregarding emotional attachment Authoritarian- Riot should be highly involved every game, from champion picks to "toxicity" Libertarian- Riot should have as limited impact on every game outside of the product that League of Legends is provided as possible, and should only make balance changes when absolutely necessary (this second part can be entirely removed to create an anarchist environment)
Edit: You could argue that some of these aren't exactly on polar ends of the spectrum and to some degree can exist at both times, but these values go along with Left, Right, Authoritarianism, and Libertarianism.
The difference is that you are attacking a person rather than an ideology
Ayy, I posted a harmless joke and he called me a troll in return.
Sorry amigo, but feminists are not all the same. You ruffled feathers by incorrectly accusing normal feminists of being loud and obnoxious like the extreme ones are.
Harmless jokes don't dismiss entire groups of people as irrelevant. And your joke came off as too salty. Thus it lost value as humor.
Oh, I'm sorry. I should specify that I meant "feminazis", but ya know... 99% of vocal "feminists" are "feminazis" anyway.
Ultimately nowadays "feminism" is just a big word with no positive meaning behind it. That is for everybody who understands what feminism is ACTUALLY about.
But let's drop this subject, because somebody might get triggered.
Oh, I'm sorry. I should specify that I meant "feminazis", but ya know... 99% of vocal "feminists" are "feminazis" anyway.
Again with the generalizations. This doesn't really solve the problem. By claiming that 99% of vocal feminists are extreme, you push normal feminists who might be thinking about speaking out to not speak out after all because they can just be accused of being "feminazis" and then ignored.
Ultimately nowadays "feminism" is just a big word with no positive meaning behind it. That is for everybody who understands what feminism is ACTUALLY about.
And what is feminism actually about?
...because somebody might get triggered.
This is like saying "I know I'm going to get downvoted by X mains, but..." at the start of a post. You're claiming that anybody who disagrees with you is biased and cannot have anything valuable to say. This is not constructive for discussing a problem.
This is like saying "I know I'm going to get downvoted by X mains, but..." at the start of a post. You're claiming that anybody who disagrees with you is biased and cannot have anything valuable to say. This is not constructive for discussing a problem.
Think what you want, you are continuing something that is allegedly against the guidelines of the Boards. Well, I'm past the point of caring about something as trivial as "guidelines" anyway.
And what is feminism actually about?
Definitely not crying about oppression, injustice, male/white/white male privileges when there are none.
Again with the generalizations. This doesn't really solve the problem. By claiming that 99% of vocal feminists are extreme, you push normal feminists who might be thinking about speaking out to not speak out after all because they can just be accused of being "feminazis" and then ignored.
If a "normal" feminist is scared of being called a "feminazi" and ignored, then maybe, just maybe they aren't actually a "true" feminist? "Normal" after all is defined as common state or behavior. If the "majority" of feminists are feminazis, then a statistical "normal" feminist is also a feminazi.
Personally, I wouldn't accuse anybody of being a "feminazi" if they aren't.
Definitely not crying about oppression, injustice, male/white/white male privileges when there are none.
Hmm, I think you may be ignoring some problems because it would be inconvenient for you to acknowledge them.
If a "normal" feminist is scared of being called a "feminazi" and ignored, then maybe, just maybe they aren't actually a "true" feminist?
That is a self fulfilling prophesy, if you harass people for speaking out against you then of course they aren't going to want to deal with that and may well stop. That doesn't make them not what they are.
"Normal" after all is defined as common state or behavior. If the "majority" of feminists are feminazis, then a statistical "normal" feminist is also a feminazi.
Just because a few are visibly or audibly more present than the rest does not make them the majority. Just the majority of those that you can perceive.
Personally, I wouldn't accuse anybody of being a "feminazi" if they aren't.
That is an opinion, not a fact. Just calling somebody something does not make it true.
Hmm, I think you may be ignoring some problems because it would be inconvenient for you to acknowledge them.
Name one.
That is a self fulfilling prophesy, if you harass people for speaking out against you then of course they aren't going to want to deal with that and may well stop. That doesn't make them not what they are.
If your actions and opinions have little to do with "fakes", then why would you be anyhow worried? Ironically "true" feminists are harassed the most by feminazis of all people.
Just because a few are visibly or audibly more present than the rest does not make them the majority. Just the majority of those that you can perceive.
That's why you should close yourself in your room, instead of making your opinion heard.
That is an opinion, not a fact. Just calling somebody something does not make it true.
The fuck? I literally begun that sentence with "personally". Turn off your bias for a moment, it's making you blind.
Why are you getting so intense about this? You're taking it way too seriously XD
Name one.
The heck with that. You claimed that the problems related to sexism don't exist. Thing is they do. Nobody is attacking you with them, but you still act as if someone is and as if they are not real.
If your actions and opinions have little to do with "fakes", then why would you be anyhow worried? Ironically "true" feminists are harassed the most by feminazis of all people.
That's why you should close yourself in your room, instead of making your opinion heard.
That's no way to solve any problem. Interacting with others and exchanging ideas is the way to improve things.
The fuck? I literally begun that sentence with "personally". Turn off your bias for a moment, it's making you blind.
Fair point, I am sorry for 'jumping the gun' so to speak.
The difference is that you are attacking a person rather than an ideology
I get that this is a League of Legends boards, but politics go greatly in understanding a person's balance philosophy
Leftist- Balance that focuses on making so it is equally satisfying to play every champion Rightist- Balance that focuses on pure mathematics, disregarding emotional attachment Authoritarian- Riot should be highly involved every game, from champion picks to "toxicity" Libertarian- Riot should have as limited impact on every game outside of the product that League of Legends is provided as possible, and should only make balance changes when absolutely necessary (this second part can be entirely removed to create an anarchist environment)
Edit: You could argue that some of these aren't exactly on polar ends of the spectrum and to some degree can exist at both times, but these values go along with Left, Right, Authoritarianism, and Libertarianism.
Absolute nonsense. Nothing a rightist/republican/conservative says or believes is ever based in math, science, logic or reason. Please try again.
Examples: God, climate change deniers, being mad at people for burning the american flag while they themselves encase their ass with american flag boxers, etc.
Ok what is the science behind the many-gendered debate
at most you could argue if you were to look at genotype of sex chromosomes the possible human combinations are XX, XY, X0, XXX, XXY. and XXYY and even then XX, X0 (Turner syndrome), and XXX identify as female, and XY, XXY (Klinefeilder), XXYY identify as male
anyone that say gender is a spectrum is also disregarding science too or making the definition of gender absolutely pointless and as such this whole preferred pronouns is even more bullshit outside of being a restriction of freedom of speech
I would point you to sex-gender distinction but I'm guessing you've already heard this a million times and choose to disregard it.
Gender itself is dumb, I honestly don't give a crap about what you identify as (as long as you don't impose yourself on others which is currently happening all over the world), but rather the role a person would physically play in reproduction is, as such sex.
It's almost as if sex and gender are two different things. Omg!
this whole preferred pronouns is even more bullshit outside of being a restriction of freedom of speech
Excuse me, knave. I identify as a king and my pronoun is "your majesty".
It'd be interesting to see how well people's political views line up in their daily lives. I'm sure this doesn't apply to all leftist/rightist/authoritarian/libertarian players, but I can see correlation being probable.
How many people, 2 out of 20?
If I did that, my comment would be removed, I'd be given a warning and possibly a ban.
I thought it'd be something like..
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11113/111137657/4118881-1029448608-4225d.jpg