Skip to content

Should there be a new division lower then bronze?

Beartic··10 votes·11,560 views

I feel with the new expatiation of the Challenger tier to alleviate the pressure in the diamond one tier there should be new division lower then bronze to even out the lower tiers. I feel as if the lower tiers (bronze and low silver) have too much of a skill gap. With the millions of people who play the game maybe a new division is needed. The new division does not even have to be lower then bronze it can be put in the middle and the current bronze can be lower then it already is. Any thoughts

47 Comments

RiotMorello17 votes

Below-Bronze is a take I like, since Bronze is such a huge bucket. Even the difference between B2 and B5 has notable difference in game mechanics competencies.

It's something we've been discussing, but I'd have to follow-up with the team that's working on Ranked stuff (you guys see the new Ranked Rewards reveal?) to see what their thoughts are.

summonerfed1 votes

There was the judging system on what rewards to give out,but we were not able to see what they look like, or what the victorious skin is/who it is for?

Would you be able to atleast tell us which champion the next victorious skin is for please?

MackleDoge1 votes

Any opinion on how it might influence the toxic and negative connotation that a fair portion of the community have about Bronze and the new division if you implement it in the mind set that it is "lower than bronze"? In the end I trust you guys at Riot to make as smart move, but since toxicity is such a big deal with this community I want to make sure it's at least being taken into consideration in the discussions.

JackYAqua1 votes

If you ever played Space Pioneers, you'll know bootcamp is awesome !

Linna Excel9 votes

Part of me says bring back unranked and make your ELO global.

Another part of me says creating a newer lower division isn't going to help unless people can get specific, personalized feedback to why they are there so they can get out. Since I don't think that is possible, I'm not 100% sure that is a good idea.

What the game really needs is better ways for people to keep track of their stats. My stats for soraka support are going to be a little different if I'm going mid or top with her. My stats for jungle Shyv are going to be a little different than top shyv.

What's my average stats with each champ overall? What are they in wins? What are they in losses? How does that compare to the average of the league I'm in. Where am I strong for my league? Where am I weak?

I think a lot of people are in bronze because they aren't getting alot of feedback as to why they are in bronze and let's be honest, LOL's tutorials and ingame information is worse than EVE-online's.

That's saying something.

MackleDoge2 votes

You bring up a really great point, after all "knowledge is power". Not knowing where they are making mistakes is a common issue for players across all ranked divisions and I'd say that being able to know what you are doing wrong and work on it is what determines whether or not you can climb ranked, even slightly more than your actual mechanics.

I think that this is even more emphasized when players start to get really frustrated by their losses in comparison to their wins or they start to get stuck in a certain division. Personally I wouldn't mind implementing the Unranked system again, but I also think that more information needs to be available for the players to view and work off of.

Tobasco da Gama1 votes

Wood Tier confirmed!

Bethor Kookalian1 votes

The catch is, ~50% of the ranked population is ALWAYS going to be bronze or lower. That's the nature of a relativity-based ranking system, and one we can't change without fundamentally changing how tiers are earned.

Hellioning1 votes

There's a new ranked rewards reveal? When did that happen?

Sir ArmaMalum1 votes

Very recently, teams only if I recall correctly. Based on wins you can get things like a ward skin and even have it upgrade as the season progresses. Rewards will be dished out at the end of season as always.

Hyrum Graff1 votes

I can't find it.. you have a link?

Sir ArmaMalum2 votes
MackleDoge1 votes

Hey sir, we can't just go around distributing information willy-nilly to the masses! We have to reserve the boop for those worthy.

Sir ArmaMalum1 votes

It's true, I should convert to the Poke more often, what was I thinking?!. That being said it's Hyrum so it's all good, I beleive he will use the information well. And conform to our sinister plan! muahahahahaha

MackleDoge1 votes

Hmm, you bring up a good point, he has demonstrated a surprising willingness to listen to our dastardly influence known colloquially as "reason". Perhaps he can be trusted with the treasured "BOOP OF KNOWLEDGE".

He Who is Pale2 votes

What about increasing the number of bronze "slots"? Add a Bronze VI - X. Since Bronze (by design) contains such a large portion of the player base, having a greater level of granularity might be good.

ShinRaigeki2 votes

The real problem with bronze is more pairing luck. I've lost easily half my matches to trolls, hardcore feeders, and [edit:] Enemy Smurfs (yes, flat out smurfs who've admitted it) in Bronze 4 than to my own incompetence

And yes, about 35-40% of those remaining losses were my own incompetence. I know ~25% don't sound like a lot, but I ended up being incompetence in some of those above matches because at some point it became intolerable...

Has a flashback of a certain Rammus who not only gave away first blood, but built 6 Zeals, and spent the whole match doing absolutely nothing but walking down mid lane over and over letting enemies kill him

...Hrng.

Frostbutt2 votes

I know who you're talking about ... but I can't remember his name. His lolking page was linked to me a few times by different people. Has "pro" in his name?

ShinRaigeki1 votes

No. All I remember was he was just walking down mid-lane constantly start to end buying Zeals... as Rammus.

King Zee2 votes

***Pro Addict. ***

Frostbutt1 votes

YES. THIS GUY.

ShinRaigeki3 votes

All I'll say is make this real (slightly toxic image, nothing really bad though):

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1/1888673_288288741318095_767644274_n.jpg

bzhen09151 votes

Why would it congratulate you?

ShinRaigeki1 votes

It's being sarcastic

Linna Excel1 votes

If that were the case it should be a golf clap.

Sir ArmaMalum2 votes

One idea I saw float around before was the idea of 'coaching' tier. To put my own spin o it, it's a tier that isn't necessarily lower than bronze, but separate, where higher ranked (Let's say, plat and up?) players can coach a player from behind the scenes. Playing with other 'coaching tier' players until they reach silver MMR, where they're left alone to fend for themselves. There would still be the ability to solo que but for those who would like to improve and play instead of troll and rage it would be a good option not only to learn, but surround themselves by like-minded peers and ideally escape the toxic portion of lower ELO ranked play. Not to mention be an awesome way for high ELO players to give back to the community directly.

Would be very hard to implement, but I have a few ideas.

Thoughts guys?


Overall I understand the number of Bronze que being a problem, but with the already established level of bronze play extending the floor I feel won't solve the problem. A lot of times I see people fall prey not to skill level but toxic play, either afk's or raging from people who don't truly want to play. Skill wise I feel people who 'belong in bronze' just get punished for trying to get better when playing ranked, and since the skill level of bronze is, for lack of better phrasing, easy to get to without trying a lower floor will not keep this behavior at bay.

Granted I don't have access to the statistics so I'm biased here, but as I stated above I feel it's less of a problem with skill and more of a problem with attitude.

exec32 votes

I feel like you guys need to bring back unranked. Removing unranked was one of the worst things you did to ranked because it turned bronze into a catch all consolation prize/participation award. I also feel because bronze is so full it pushes a lot of people higher than what they should be (some silvers should be bronze, some golds should be silver etc).

tehdef1 votes

Please add Wood League... >>

MackleDoge5 votes

I think Riot should actually go back to the system that had "Unranked for those who had a really low MMR/Elo. The issue with developing another ranked tier below Bronze is that there is already a toxic mentality and a negative connotation to being in Bronze. How many times have you heard "God you're so Bronze", "Bronze scrub", etc? If you add another tier below Bronze it could potentially make the issue much much worse and lead to more toxicity.

Beartic1 votes

I think this will always be a problem. If you get rid of all the tier except for diamond and Challenger then have the rest unranked people will just be saying "God you;re so Diamond", ect.

MackleDoge3 votes

Except you'd have a huge difference in the skill level in Diamond at that point since only 200 people can be in Challanger, you'd have thousands of people in Diamond and the ranked system would mean literally nothing.

I agree with you that the amount of players in Bronze should be spread out, but just look at how you termed it: "lower then bronze?", "like bronze but lower". It already has the 'less and worse then' mentality that people insult those in Bronze for. What should be done is find a way to manage LP so that those with very little consistently or low MMR/Elo are put on "ranked hiatus" where they are dropped out of their ranked league and get a small normal game restriction or something of that nature. This would allow them a break from ranked and help to alleviate issues with tilting.

Another thought would be to decrease the individual number of players in each Bronze division group and have more of them of stratified skill level / MMR/ ELO that way you are in a league with equivalent players and it theoretically should free up movement room in between divisions. Furthermore, the actual ranked division is only moderately limiting as to movement in ranked, the real issue is promotional matches and the system that is used in that instance. Being in Bronze 2 doesn't mean you only play Bronze 2, the matchmaking system pairs you off of MMR not actual rank, so theoretically a Bronze 2 player with Silver 3 MMR will be playing with and against players around Silver 3 MMR regardless of what ranked tier the player is actually in.

JackYAqua3 votes

Cardboard
jk ^^
How about a division called bootcamp? Where the mmr isn't pressured as much as in the 'real' divisions. That way, new players are automatically set into bootcamp and must play ~10 games there at least before they can get out. And if they fail and fail and fail and try again, then at least their mmr won't be broken.

Beartic1 votes

This does sound like a good idea. I, however, was thinking why not just make a new division like bronze but lower. This would more evenly spread out the the skill level at the bottom like the way they did with challenger at the top. That was people can feel accomplished as they climb and work to improve instead of being matched against people of a wide verity of skill levels.

Loomybinn1 votes

I personally think that their should be an Unranked, or something like that below Bronze. The big reason that I feel that way is because in sports, which is where the medals system comes from, Bronze means something. If you got bronze in the Olympics, people aren't going to be like, "You are such a bronze athlete!" Bronze is an accomplishment, though you are still not the best. Thus, Bronze in League, although it would be the least of all accomplishments, should be an accomplishment. You shouldn't just get bronze for trying, IMHO.

ShadowAsders231 votes

Where is this new Ranked Rewards thread that Morello spoke of? I've been searching everywhere for it, but I can't find a thing.

Sir ArmaMalum1 votes

Boop

A lot of people saw it through an alert in the PBE client instead of the thread itself.

bzhen09151 votes

The big problem is that this promotes even MORE toxicity.

generally toxic players call people bronze when they make a mistake and want to pick at them. Creating a lower tier would simply give ragers another excuse to make poor comments.

SweetJohnnyCage1 votes

I think it's a solid idea, but like someone else brought up, you'd need to give some feedback as to why they're being placed into sub-Bronze tier. Copper tier? Wood is too rough hahah.

Without knowing why you're being placed in that tier, I fear players wouldn't necessarily get better. Not saying they're all bad, but overall, I think more feedback should be given from the system in regards to why you're losing or winning. Maybe more comprehensive stats shown on the first screen after a win/loss, pointing out how you matched up against your lane opponent in CS, damage to that person, times you almost got caught by the jungler, something like that. Giving players more information on their performance is key to breeding better summoners.

Cerbearus1 votes

Wood tier Rito plz

the Anarchit3cht1 votes

The thing about providing knowledge though, is only going to help the players that want to get better, or admit that they make mistakes. The thing about a lot of low ELO players isn't that they aren't provided with the resources to learn, it's moreso that they are unwilling to learn. They believe they are perfect and aren't likely to admit their mistakes or attempt to improve their play, but rather, blame it on other players.

Secondly, while players over exaggerate the number of trolls or mistake poor play for trolling, I do believe hat trolling in ranked is a problem. It encourages players to try less, even in games with non-trolls. I think punishment in ranked games should be harder than in non-ranked games.

LovelySkylark1 votes

I definitely think that something needs to happen with the way ranked is for Bronze. I agree that there is a huge skill gap between the tiers in bronze, but the last thing League needs is more toxicity. Creating one lower than Bronze would promote more people to blame you for being "worse than bronze" which could be even more of an insult. It's hard though, with how most of the community bases your skill on ranked roles when perhaps you didn't quite have a great day that day, or got put in roles you weren't good at, or even get stuck with trolls. I mean, if there was some way to make Bronze not such a bad place to be, I think more people would play ranked. I know many people who refuse to play ranked because it's honestly a scary thing to be in. Especially being placed in Bronze, people get poked at, and it's truly not fun. I wonder if there could be a way to get a type of Team Builder feature in ranked, so perhaps players could get the roles that they want instead of complaining about it. Just a thought.

Astropanda1 votes

This gone make people feel like poop. Maybe add additional higher tiers like in starcraft but meh.

SkyMel1 votes

item 3421 lol

Mortyr1 votes

Yes. Wood < Copper < Bronze < Silver < Gold < Plat < Diamond < Challenger

Beats291 votes

Yes it should. As a bronze player myself, many high-elo player have no idea of the difference of skill and game knowledge between bronze 5 and bronze 3 for example.

Of course there're exceptions, but most are way far worse. I found way harder to climb out of bronze than out of bronze 3 for example.

Beartic1 votes

The hardest part of my climb was out of B3-B2 after that it was pretty smooth sailing.

Rubitonabuilding1 votes

Opening a new tier below bronze is like poking a hole in the bottom of the Bronze bucket and letting its contents spill down into a Wooden bucket. It wouldn't solve anything at all, it would simply make it one step further that you have to go to get to diamond or challenger, and all the problems we currently see with Bronze would be pushed down to Wood.

More from Live Gameplay Balance

More by Beartic