Skip to content

Lord Van Damm's Pillager

AFKS FUNERAL··1 votes·742 views

I don't get the point of making item 3104 if it's the same as item 3031. I mean at least item 3089 and item 3090 has a minor different. So any of you know why riot made this item. If riot is going to take one of them down I prefer the good old item 3031 to stay because it look more badass. :D

5 Comments

Thats My Brand3 votes

The point is that Dominion lacks passive laning phase that allows ADCs to gather heaps of gold for item 1038 . Build paths of IE and BT are supposed to be sifficult, it's part of game balance that carries build big items.

Dominion and TT aren't really an easy place for ranged carries, so they don't need to be gated by build paths there.

The7thKing1 votes

its supposed to be, you have something as a alternative for it

AFKS FUNERAL1 votes

so why is it the only alternative, not tri force, dorans etc. That's what I am wondering.

ShadowNinetails1 votes

Because it was literally the only item that item 1038 could build into on those maps. item 3072 already had item 3181 and item 3139 has item 3137. It's actually one of the best things crit-based champs could have to make a more accessible version of item 3031 .

Triforce doesn't have this problem because it's comprised of parts that are all highly accessible and the Doran's items are already replaced by the more power Prospector line.

Tsiddique1 votes

Just like their doing on all non-summoners rift maps. They are removing the items that build from b.f. sword and needlessly large rod into other items which are more affordable. This is mainly because laning phase is either very short or non-existent, such as the case in ARAM and Dominion. I expect them not to remove them from ARAM, but the other maps.

More from Live Gameplay Balance

More by AFKS FUNERAL